You know nothing and im done speaking to you
Your are funny.
1 Like
1 when my friend plays i use 262 and they mostly do higher brs in rb personality i stay with sim
Ah so you’re using the 262 at 6.7 (the BR that many here are suggesting) and doing well? Wow that’s crazy.
Now play the 7.0 ones.
So move it down, since it cannot compete with other 7.0 fighters.
Yes.
Even surperprops have no issue fighting 262s. They’ll never get hit if they have the rare ability to move their mouse a little.
3 Likes
Yes, as long as you plan a little bit before you fly aka not flying directly at the enemy you can side climb and attack them from behind before they are even prepared. I take out the other early jets first because they take a while to accelerate; then I go for props, then run when they spot me. Then just fly until their energy is drained, then take them out. It’s just a plane; you can’t run in without a plan in it.
This only works with the A-2a because it’s not facing jets that outdo it in every way every match.
Which you can only do because the A-2a gets an airspawn and they don’t; not so easy when the F-84s get that too, on top of just being better.
You’re just demonstrating exactly why the 262s should move to 6.7.
4 Likes
Yea fair ig but the f84s are evil for the a2a they always comeoutta nowhere you can use the same in jabo
Everything you guys both said agrees that you can’t do the same in the Jabo. Everything that you’re describing works mainly on the basis that you’re primarily fighting props, and only a couple jets. Moving the other regular Me 262s down to 6.7 would give them the exact same advantages and disadvantages as the A-2a.
1 Like
Everyone is seeing this wrong. Put it at 14.0 👍🏼 same results, more rewarding satisfaction
1 Like
It would also be garbage due to its dozens of issues they’d also have to simulate.
just buy new engines everyday
The causes for some of these issues are not modelled in game. For any vehicle.
You likely know that already of course.
1 Like
and neither are “historical” BRs.
That would still put it at the same BR as the Gloster Meteor as it entered service only a few months later (July vs April 1944), in fact 1 day after the ME-262s first air combat against a RAF Mosquito.
I think they quite consistent, is just not on the positive way.
1 Like
Come again?
Not going to explain the context of the last 8 messages I wrote. Read the REASON for why I said what I did.
It’s about the last post exclusively.
No. Your logical flaw is to assume that all other (axis or allied aircraft) would have correct historical BRs - which they have not.
Nobody with a clear mind will support historic BRs - just imagine facing a lobby full of Me 163s and 262s fighting P-51 D-5s/D-10s. Even if 50% of them will explode whilst trying to land (the 163s) the technology gaps are way too large.
No, your logic is flawed - same as the logic of the fellow player you are responding to. If you think this through even a plain Yak-3 would have the same BR as a 262.
Besides that- you are obviously not aware of that your mentioned Meteors were F1s (not implemented in wt) which had a top speed of ~ 660 kmph - so ~ 200 kmph slower than the 1944 service 262 A-1a.
Detailed view:
There is zero evidence that the in wt implemented (late) Meteor F 3 ever saw service in WW 2 - there is not even a clear number available for the F 1 versions which saw service (not implemented in wt) or the early F 3s (not implemented in wt).
You will find here and there some hints (4 aircraft as detachment to Holland in 45, allegedly early F 3s) but the low number of delivered early F 3 aircraft with the 20% weaker engines than the (late) F 3s indicate that the (late) F 3s implemented in wt never saw combat (a link you might find interesting).
And even if a single (late) F 3 (imho then a 1945 plane) would have been delivered - there would be a (theoretical) need for a higher BR than the 262 A-1a - otherwise the whole idea of historical BRs would make no sense in the first place.
In case you have better sources please let me know. Thx in advance!
Have a good one!
3 Likes
That’s really slow. Even slower than the projected top speed for the Kikka…