Its not really a source
Gaijin doesnt count it as source at least
1 Like
I don’t know if you played the eagle on the dev server but back then it’s RWR MFD was just some green dots. I made a bug report and this is what we have now. I don’t see any problem with it
1 Like
Gaijoob only wants flight manuals and authored works for the manuals. Thing is, the manual for the F-15’s weapon employment is classified :)
1 Like
Do you guya think that we are going to get the F-15STOL/MTD?
Radar MFD not RWR :D
Let’s see if we get F-16XL since it got passed to devs, if it comes then yeah.
1 Like
What’s wrong with it?
Not even secondary? It’s literally sponsored by the air Force after all
1 Like
God forbid you find an accurate source that is not a manual. Jokes aside, I’ve made 2 bug reports, one for the AN/APG-70 and one for the 63(V)1. Basically the same radar. Used multiple sources and this was one of them. Eitherway they were both refused. So the range of the radard stays at 120 km’s
it must even give target type… but looks like NCTR is too hard for gaijin
1 Like
isnt a lot of it classified or something? kinda makes sense
i think theres still enough information.
2 Likes
If we are talking about radar display then we should absolutely be able to.
If DCS can, war thunder can.
1 Like
To add on though, this is a lot deeper than just Strike Eagle MFD.
The overall implementation and functions of War Thunders radar can be much more deeper and detailed.
Not deeper and detailed as in people who want to have a more laid back experience need to do a lot more in order to utilize the radar, but deeper and detailed as in there should be way more info and feedback provided to the pilot.
There should be many more simple yet meaningful features such as proper target designation while in tws, so that it is possible to mark targets as possible in real life and shown in the screenshot I provided!
I won’t stay off topic but I hope it is possible to make a suggestion regarding this as an actual game feature soon.
welp
this part of discussion about NCTR
but yeah, it presented in DCS
1 Like
Can you be able to provide more info on the APG 63/70 if you have them.
1 Like
What exactly are you seeking to achieve?
Just interested to read or get something fixed in game?
hopefully get a bit more range on the F-15’s radar :)
2 Likes
160nmi is insane
Also found a line on page 45 saying the F-16 had 80nmi range
1 Like