So, correct me if I’m wrong, but it looks like Gaijin thinks Western MANPADS use the same bang-bang guidance instead of an alternating dual/single plane system as the missile rotates?
And they think this because a Soviet missile (which had notably inferior technology available, especially computer chips) was not able?
and buffs too. There is no evidence that Abrams loader can load a 120 every 5 seconds. (while there is proof for its upgraded hull armor and OF COURSE Gaijin will deny that)
“We assume the Stinger is bad”
“We assume the Leopard 2A7V is worse than the Strv 122”
“We assume the Abrams hull armor is bad”
But:
“We assume Yak 141 could have carried X weapon”
“We assume the TURMS can fire 3BM42”
Bruh, I really liked the roadmap and economy changes that were done together with the community.
But no we are back to this :(
The only ones it really can
Hey gaijin atleast put links into that sources that you guys are publishing wily nily, saying that this how it should be and let us see if that .ru pops up.
Common sense? Okay one moment.
Read this, then argue back.
Somehow before even reading the content of the post I knew it was another ‘‘here’s why NATO sucks in our game’’ explanation post that doesn’t really explain anything.
We believe that
I remember those exact same words when talking about the Abrams hull armor as wel
We’ll explain why we believe that hull armor was not reinforced.
We don’t believe that it’s possible to further enhance the protection
We’re closely monitoring the data and believe that at the moment, there’s no need for an increase to the current Battle Rating threshold for aviation from 12.3 to 12.7
Also
With this assumption
No one actually wants to know what you believe or what you assume, we want you to stop assuming things and stop enforcing your own beliefs since they’re clearly not in the best interest of game and vehicle balance.
You deny practically all sources presented by the community and dismiss almost anything that isn’t actually classified information but then justify more than questionable aspects of the game because you believe and you assume it to be so, like how you assume NATO spends trillions of dollars and decades of development to make worse vehicles, and NATO cannot possible do something better than Russia despite documentation suggestion otherwise, but you just believe or assume it to be so.
So what these past few blogs have showed us is that gaijin clearly thinks they are smarter than any military or government in the world and know their own tech better than said militaries do.
What a joke.
and its that logic that makes games/devs get to big for there boots and someone comes in later down the line and takes the crown, gaijin dont have a competitor so feel like they can pull stunts like this and then wonder why the community review bombed last time over the economy. take that logic elsewhere because its a toxic logic
So… Because the Igla can’t, there’s no way the Stinger or Mistral can?
This is literally the Western Technology meme of the dude swinging an AK at a drome lol
so the type 91s dont get upped alongside the stingers? also the whole “they possibly couldnt perform better than the 9M39” part is very telling off how this company operates
Ordinary ignorance in technical matters, nothing more
Exactly and a great demonstration.
This entire article comes across as trying to be smart, but not realising how foolish it actually is.
In their Russian dev stream that dude can’t even hit an AI with laser guided bombs. Hell, he can’t even pull the flaps in before it rips. You expect them to understand how missiles work?
thats why they are making a new list… to distract :D
It’s called “developers don’t play their game”
Exactly why people get annoyed
don’t forget flying out the f15 to instantly rip it’s wings off.
“Primary sources will always be followed or secondary sources if primary sources are not available (until we dont like what they say, then we’ll just model stuff however we like)”
"We cannot rely on Soviet sources for western tech (until its convenient for us for us to do so to move along our agenda) "
Glad to see your modelling of western tech continues to be hamstrung by your hypocrisy regarding modelling practises so as to make Russia more competitive than they should be