and its that logic that makes games/devs get to big for there boots and someone comes in later down the line and takes the crown, gaijin dont have a competitor so feel like they can pull stunts like this and then wonder why the community review bombed last time over the economy. take that logic elsewhere because its a toxic logic
So… Because the Igla can’t, there’s no way the Stinger or Mistral can?
This is literally the Western Technology meme of the dude swinging an AK at a drome lol
so the type 91s dont get upped alongside the stingers? also the whole “they possibly couldnt perform better than the 9M39” part is very telling off how this company operates
Ordinary ignorance in technical matters, nothing more
Exactly and a great demonstration.
This entire article comes across as trying to be smart, but not realising how foolish it actually is.
In their Russian dev stream that dude can’t even hit an AI with laser guided bombs. Hell, he can’t even pull the flaps in before it rips. You expect them to understand how missiles work?
thats why they are making a new list… to distract :D
It’s called “developers don’t play their game”
Exactly why people get annoyed
don’t forget flying out the f15 to instantly rip it’s wings off.
“Primary sources will always be followed or secondary sources if primary sources are not available (until we dont like what they say, then we’ll just model stuff however we like)”
"We cannot rely on Soviet sources for western tech (until its convenient for us for us to do so to move along our agenda) "
Glad to see your modelling of western tech continues to be hamstrung by your hypocrisy regarding modelling practises so as to make Russia more competitive than they should be
you would think so, BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT…
For a company that markets the game as “Realisitc” the fact that they used the “We assume that…” is a MASSIVE red flag for everyone.
Well, of course, if you arent Russia. Sorry USSR, then you just get buffed by coping devs.
That’s only a secondary source
What ever happened to not using Russian sources for NATO vehicles? Also, your reasoning for this boils down to “Russian MANPADs sucked so we ASSUME NATO MANPADs sucked as well”.
gaijin: “iglas are bad so stingers must also be bad”
Time for some popcorn. Drama is fun.
The Update title should be “Gas Lighting”
“Comrade if glorious soviet engineers cant make the missile pull harder it means there is no way this missile can pull harder than similar soviet thing”