i laugh when ppl say theres no russian bias in this game.
apds normalization that gave +1º than the plate of the t54 back in the day
the russian tank barrels having more hp
the is6 issue
the wood log in the back of russian tanks having more effectiveness than rha
russian side skirts made of era that eat apfsds
the overperforming aphe
not modeling renerative steering that favoures lighter tanks (russian)
and so many others. it all comes down to this dev blog where they admit to actually making russian gear stronger by making the competition trash.
this was never a fair game but at least now they admit it…
You said it right about the apples. That’s why all rockets have average overload or maximum overload, but not average for one and maximum for the others
You cannot do that with fucking missile systems. They are obviously different in its functionalities, mechanics, number of stabilization fins and so on. If you make a comparison of that it only shows how lacking on basic logic you are. It’s the same as saying well, I have this Volkswagen Beetle and this AMG GT-R, both have wheels and a engine. If i put the same engine on both they go on the same speed and turn the same… thats just stupid.
And it was explained that due to the Iglas use of Bang-Bang control methods, it is less efficient than PID steering. Have you actually read the thread at all?
Yes. They dont have documentation evidence that the missile is able to track targets turning 16gs. They dont have evidence of the missile being capable of 16g’s maximum overload at all. For all we know the maximum could be anything from 10 to 16gs but there is nothing on the papers of the missile that says it can do 16g
Okay, then all tanks, which in the documents speed is specified in mph and not kph we reduce the speed, because it is not known how many kilometers, not miles per hour he goes.
You know, if you actually read the thread you would also see my suggestion to remove the efficiency problem of the Igla so it can keep pace with the western systems. Otherwise it’s going to be left behind since it is a poor system. They choose instead to hold back western systems
yeah, and this is the most ignorant thing up to now, I’ve seen regarding this game.
This is like saying, if I can’t do something, noone else can, without trying to proof or disproof it.
Also this is assuming, that the russian, known tech, is the best possible, which is very unliekely at best (looking at improvements in all technologies in the last decades)
I didn’t suggest using it on the stinger. According to the formula that is derived from igla data, we can convert igla’s average overload to its maximum overload.
The formula is correct as it is made for igla.
That would be 16g. The stinger has 20 or 22, the mistral 25.
My blessed man, how can you not see that applying a formula for a different type of missile, using a different missile, to guess the average g on other systems that don’t have the same control system and control surfaces wrong?
…the way its control method is used IRL contributes to its turn efficiency problem. That’s where this 66.37% efficiency comes from. The bang-bang method.