The biggest jump in protection will be SEP4 & T-14, which few countries have equivalents to.
@Sombralix
Except for the fact that Relikt is one shot gone. Follow up shot will pen, even 3BM60 pens T-80BVM’s “permanent” armor.
well doesn’t help the armor calculator in hangar is very buggy
What follow up shot, you’re dead after your 1st doesn’t disable the Russian tank
6 Likes
follow up shot? If you don’t kill a t80bvm in the first shot or disable it, you’re dead.
2 Likes
the U.S Military already got a T80 BVM from ukraine, it also got 4 t84s from ukraine. You need to be caught up to speed.
Getting them =/= testing against them.
Anyone who uses this graph to show DU is “inferior” to WHA at high velocities is a brainlet who doesn’t understand this graph.
The 10MJ and L/D 30 should give you the idea that this is an optimisation graph.
If you have a propellent charge that releases 10MJ muzzle energy and you are aiming to make an L/D 30 projectile what’s the optimum velocity to achieve best penetration and henceforth, the optimum weight and dimensions. As M/V increases, weight and dimensions of the projectile decrease with a proportion of square root and which is why the penetration “decreases” since the projectile is smaller
If you take the same projectile and up the propellent to produce more Muzzle energy and therefore more M/V, guess what, penetration increases
1 Like
and what do you think they did with those tanks
Currently nothing.
lol ok bro you keep thinking that the US Military obtains current model Russian/Ukrainian tanks and just let them collect dust.
The more and more you type the more i laugh. You make claims, like " max loading crew reduces ammo detonation " but you don’t post links.
I can literally POST ACTUAL LINKS of Captured Russian T-90 tanks in the U.S , in Parking Lots in Maryland. https://youtu.be/F-uCl5zbiwM And you actually type stuff that many of us laugh at on a daily basis.
2 Likes
Why do you think USA lets them collect dust?
Nope, never did. I said may, not authoritative. So you made up a strawman as well.
Not sure why you laugh at the fact USA does testing…
Thanks for posting a video that proves me right, BTW.
@sartt
All your screenshots prove I never lied nor trolled.
The fact you claim everyone but yourself is uninformed proves us all correct.
We aren’t liars & trolls for criticizing Russian tanks.
I have an update to this BTW.
Guaranteed ammo det seems most likely tied to how many fragments hit the ammo.
Replacing that old hypothesis.
The first one quite literally shows you lying.
Except you did say exactly this, and he shows a screenshot of it. You didn’t say “may” like you claimed, you outright said that an expert crew reduces ammo detonation.
The post is right there. It’s not like he has edited your comment. In fact you have edited this precise comment 3 times, and yet this statement has not been changed.
6 Likes
Thanks for further proving I never lied.
I appreciate the assistance in dealing with Sartt’s false accusations.
It was a hypothesis from the beginning.
It was NEVER an authoritative statement.
1- Hypothesis’ aren’t authoritative statements. Thanks for proving I never lied.
2- IRL alleged penetration is 700mm at 2km, in-game it’s 680mm which is likely more accurate.
3- Which is a fine take to have. Rooivalk has the longest range missiles in WT, has thermals, and warning equipment.
AH Mk1 has Starstreaks, which is the best anti-helicopter missile in the game.
4- No Soviet tank has 750mm of permanent protection.
5- Nope, I said lighter versions of jets are superior, which isn’t my opinion, but DEFYN’s opinion backed up with video tests.
This guy has been doing this stuff for weeks, I’ve noticed it, you’ve noticed it, and others have noticed it.
8 Likes
Cause he replied before the edit, if he waited he would’ve known without a doubt that it was a hypothesis.
I never meant it as an authoritative statement, HENCE the edit.
@sartt
Yes, everyone knows I’m helpful, sincere, & honest.
You’re the only one antagonizing everyone on the forum for kicks.
Both of your are ignoring this BTW.
I thought I added words that indicated it was a hypothesis, and I didn’t discover my reflexes left out words I intended to be there until much later.
That part is my fault. Should’ve stuck around & proof-read it, or read it right after posting. And clearly I didn’t.
What isn’t my fault is people antagonizing after the edit.
He literally edited it in the last 20 minutes. He has been caught and is now trying to dig sideways out of his own grave.
2 Likes
He’s never going to admit it. This is proof, this is why i screen cap people on the internet, they will literally lie to you, and make it seem like you’re the one thats wrong.