Same here haha
What about premium XIVc with the Dutch triangle?
Does that mean I might actually have a low tier Canadian aircraft to go with my RAM’s : D
And the Wellington MK III, that served in RCAF 419 squadron, you can see the serial number at the back being marked as Z1572 and it’s real life code is VR-Q
1 Like
I see, if so, need to find a way to bug report it and Wellington Mk III, whose base skin is also of an RCAF example…
Tho I’m personally still on the fence with these base skin is a different operator nation, but it was also used by the current operator nation vehicles, and the viability of arguing for said changes.
And APHE this thing will be a monster
1 Like
Yep
The premium XIVc, RB160, carried code VL-A and was part of No. 322 (Dutch) Squadron RAF
2 Likes
If Dutch then the Dutch flag should be added then hidden within Britain then added to the Dutch sub tree
1 Like
Or and hear me out…
Keep it as premium in UK tech tree but add it as tech tree aircraft in France as well
(P-51 case. US has it as standard tech tree but is premium in UK tech tree)
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT
Is there further plan of buff on reload of HMS Rodney and HMS Nelson?
Current 35 seconds is pick from 30 seconds and 35 seconds by developers because they believe ‘ship is too OP with 30 seconds’.
But it was when there are only 7.0 for all capital ship and HMS Rodney was 7.0. Now BR range is increased to 8.7, and HMS Rodney, and upcoming HMS Nelson is not top battleship anymore. Thus, can we expect more legit reload of 30 seconds? Or do we have to make report base on same document again?
2 Likes
Or that, true doubles have been added before
If it has the T30’s APHE shell (and it should be I believe) it will have very low penetration.
We need the HE shell.
I mean if it’s the same APHE as the T30 then it will be very situational as it has less than 200mm pen.
Still will be a very fun tank imo.
Been wondering about this.
Also about the British 15” because Gneisenau with its 20 seconds and better armour is the same BR as Warspite. And due to the reload disparity there’s not a huge DPM disparity. In a minute a warspite puts out 16 shells, Gneisenau puts out 18…. Gneisenau has the same pen at 10km as warspite does at 8.5km, so that 25-26 second reload would be really nice.
1 Like
Stabilised? Flank get a nice spot and you will wreck.
Unstabilized. It’ll likely mostly be good at brawling.
1 Like
Char 25t did ok at 8.0+ with 90mm APHE
just have to aim for sides and weakspots
1 Like
Gaijin reaction going through low tier Britain to only find that most aircraft operators flag will have to be changed :
8 Likes
and if nothing else (and im not saying it shouldnt be for all of them, it 100% should) Vanguard should have gotten a reload buff to make it truly stand out from the 7.7s and be truly worthy of being a higher BR. At the moment, im on the fence whether it should actually be 8.0. Only reason for it is the SC shells
2 Likes
Now that more and more modern weapons are being added will Gaijin change the acceptable sources used?
The more modern something is the more likely it will be to have classified information which makes reporting on it difficult.
There are also mechanics IRL that Gaijin has decided not to model in game. An example would be the recent Aster 30 missile that uses lateral thrust to increase the “hit to kill” probability.
Gaijin hasn’t modeled lateral thrust, would they consider buffing the max G for example, giving it an inaccurate performance in one metric in order to simulate the real world capabilities that aren’t modeled?
2 Likes