I was wondering, since we have seen the wwii german X-4 AAM on the fw190f8, will other aircraft that used it also receive it?
And more importantly, will it affect the BR too much?
There is no one singular procedure. Sometimes multiple may be added at once or some in the future too. Suggestions are always welcome unless we have offically confirmed something. Though its very probable we will see more AH-64Es at some stage.
Its possible others will yes. But suggestion reports are always welcome regardless if there is evidence.
A lot of things were wrong with the SAMP/T system in-game and had been reported, did it receive fixes since the last dev-server? @Smin1080p_WT
Several have been resolved. They will be updated in the coming days once the intented outcomes can be confirmed.
Nice. That is some nice inclusions.
Also, with Prendergast’s Spitfire on sale again, would it be possible to bump this bug report? (so said RCAF pilot can have the RCAF’s home nation as its operator)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vXREnNMT9pZO
Or are we still two deep in dev season, and it be lost? I had just figured it coming back to sale would be the most likely time it would be fixed.
day 15 of waiting for more domestic chinese vehicles and not exportslop like the vt5 or vn1c
Its not something likely to change before the major im afriad. The dev team are very much focused on that currently.
The wishlisting topic is here: Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 2)
Please use that rather than spam off topic here.
Where’s our long awaited J10C
Any ideas if the F5TH & Sufa BRs for ARB were very much placeholder or considered final untill stats review once the update was released? @Smin1080p_WT ? they feel abit underwhelming (specially super tigris) as of rn
All BRs are subject to change up until release. So sadly none can be confirmed at this time.
Hello Folks, I’m just a bit curious but what do you all think of the future addition of submarines to War Thunder? Personally I’m excited as it introduces the possibility for not just submarines to be added, but also anti-submarine aircraft, ships, etc. to be added. IIRC they were confirmed that they are to be added in the future by one of the devs, hence why I’m asking.
would be very fun to see, hopefully attracts more players for naval
sadge…
BTW, are there any plans to increase the maximum br even further in the near future (2-3 updates from now), preferably 15.0?
Agreed! Plus I think the playstyle for submarines would a bit more “lowkey” when compared to playing other ships, thus making it maybe a little easier for new players to be introduced to Naval.
@Smin1080p_WT on another note… i asked about this when spice 1000 was added; and now with 250 its still the same issue; the GNSS mode on IR+GNSS guided ordnance is literally unusable, limiting a lot the ordnance capabilities… when GNSS+IR was first added (with hammer) GNSS worked untill the second day of devserver that it magically stopped working… if the bug report is being held from fix for balance reasons i wouldnt mind it, but being forward about it would also be nice. Anyways, any update would be grateful. :)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ntVms3xAqKO7
When could we see a water physics redo for amphibious vehicles? The canal waters seem to be as wavey as the open sea waters, making your vehicle bounce around like a kangaroo running off 12 energy drinks, while occasionally nearly drowning at the same time, it’s really annoying especially in Eastern Europe
Honestly with more and more ordinance having multiple guidance modes we need a mechanic to be able to swap between each mode properly. Like you said weapons with IR guidance + GNSS cannot use GNSS.
Something like how the seeker mode can be changed on some SPAA (like the Strela) I think could work well for stuff like this. Would also mean we wouldn’t need to have weapons split into different modes like how JAGM will be split into a SAL and IR modes, would then just be able to chose to fire it either as IR or as SAL.
GNSS won’t be usable until LOAL is added and the seekers of Hammer and Kh-38MT are introduced.
Said seekers are programmable, and have a 1.5km range after being guided by GNSS up until that point, where they then scan for the programmed target and track it for the remainder of the journey.
[These details might have some errors, this is based on memory of reading Hammer and Kh-38MT seeker documents and the memories might be off a little.]
Until then… copy paste AGM-65D seeker.