Very good addition tbh
yooooo chillll with that
Sorry, just sucks that the F3 Late is practically unplayable at the moment, but ICE is boarderline OP. ICE should not be the same BR as the FA2
1 Like
tbh now that the EF is out, do what you want with the ICE, I will not be playing it anymore 😂😂
As always, just the bare minimum
Oh god… that better be a pack of multiple vehicles and not be like the F-89D being locked behind the F-89B and the Boomerang Mk.2 being locked behind the Boomerang Mk.1
1 Like
Gszabi did datamine a pack called “Two fronts”.
I don’t know, but that does sound like it could be related to these vehicles.
2 Likes
I needed to make a custom helmet, even if it had not yet been implemented because blank pilot helmets looks bad.
2 Likes
Potential for a funny 8 Tiger only lineup lol, Tiger H&E, The furry craft event one, The 2 prototypes(if you count these), The Sturmtiger and now these.
1 Like
Does this extend to the F-15J as as well?
unfortunality there seems to be no change in naval target acquisition time - the drastical decrease with one of the latest patches was totally unneccesary and has a very negative inflict on coastal gameplay! It was a one-sided buff of bluewater fleet.
I guess there is more no fly zone after all
1 Like
Now my team can collapse on both fronts just like the real thing 🔥🔥🔥
3 Likes
Hey, maybe we can see some decompression at korean tiers eventually!
Please. It shouldn’t be fighting normal phantoms.
Can planes like the SU-27, F-4FKWS, Mig-29G, and F-15A now go up 0.3? They shouldn’t be fighting 12.0s. And all current 13.7s should go to 14.0. Not just the F-15E/I.
4 Likes
Nah, better will be
13.0 → 13.3
13.3 → 13.7
13.7 → 14.0
14.0 → 14.3 (as it now)
We need total decompression, but new planes like EFT/Rafale and top F-15 can’t just be as current 13.7
7 Likes
I’d say more than that. The Aim-54 was intentionally coded with dual-plane maneuvering in mind. This can be seen in this video here: https://youtu.be/V95SEYZseJU?si=L470B6YPx66HrFMj&t=446
The missile rolls and pulls great AoA to hit that maneuvering target. So, the Aim-54A and C should also get 25G overload since it’s not designed to maneuver on a single plane. Whenever they decide to model dual plane maneuverability they can just make it primarily pull 25G and rarely down to 18G.
In addition to this, the Aim-54C should get its ECCM (anti-chaff and multipath reduction) and 50 degrees of AoA (as it had in real life of course).
Most likely all in 1 pack