Major Update "Spearhead" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Then pls go on show me your source or any manual of a Mig-29 9.12 that even mentions the r27er

@Smin1080p_WT Curious if you can answer this. With the new MBT vehicle track mode, will we see it be able to track ground targets in the future? The tanks themselves don’t have a radar system to track the air targets, it is specifically apart of the thermal system which I’m not 100% sure if its a contrast lock, I imagine it is because it is specifically locking onto the hotter signature in the displayed image, but it is quite literally the exact same feature that tracks ground vehicles which is being used to track the air targets.

Russia using Sosna-U, The Swedish use UTAAS (Universal Tank and Anti-Aircraft System), and so on which is listed throughout the available vehicles getting this new feature. These are primariyl meant to be used for tracking tanks but have the capability to track aircraft.


Seems they removed the new smoke launchers and sensors from the dev I wonder what this was for?

SepV3

7 Likes

I dont even think the SEP V3 used these

they’re looking into being able to use them, but they don’t actively use them

they don’t need to mention it for it to be compatible, the seeker head, guidance system, everything is the same except for the rocket booster, the missile is modular

How was china ever the focus of this update?

Only interesting thing we’re getting is a missile for the Z-10ME everything else is just C&P slop

it was tested on a SEP, and incudes both ROSY smoke, and the AN/VVR-4 LWS

@Smin1080p_WT
Is there any plans on introducing any of the JH-7’s other missiles like the KD-88?
its very similar to the KH-59 being added for the Venezuelan SU-30

Like the KH-59 its also ~M0.9 it has a TV seeker variant it has a slightly longer range but has a smaller warhead

We have already seen how LOAL missiles perform from ground vehicles and it’s still super overpowered.

Oh, that bug (and game mode)
Thanks for reminding me of that certified meme

1 Like

They should have, but the game simulates everything from the center of the helicopter and gimbals of the laser of 85-90 degrees, and it is possible that there are no blind spots, this is even correct. But the Mi-28nm simply received protection from above, which should not be. A little different - not to get blind spots of 10 degrees and to get a completely upper hemisphere without 30 degrees.

Hey, will those AGM179 characters (Ah64E) that don’t have AGM in real-world servers retain AGM179 in the official servers?

Seeing the UDES 33 still triggers memories from that time lol.

1 Like

you need to give up AAMs to carry the extra flares btw. whatever smin said was just a bad excuse to hide the fact that the OCU is undertiered In ARB to sell more GE.

All their loadouts are still subject to change. However the primary reason for the E variants being added is AGM-179.

3 Likes

Me when the Helicopters added to give others F&F have fire and forget

why is Netz with only non-IRCCM python 3 at same ARB BR as F-16A OCU with AIM-9M and Magic 2?
why wasn’t the F-16 ADF at lower ARB BR than F-16AJ since it has no A2G munitions? (before it got aim120)

1 Like

Netz already performs well for its current BR, so there hasn’t been any option to decrease it. F-16AJ doesn’t receive additional CMs over the ADFs.