The intention is for this update. Subject to change.
3 Likes
The aircraft is still WIP, however if there is evidence more stations can carry them, a report is fine.
2 Likes
Less the stealth for me thats a concern and more how well they do the FM and what weapons they give them.
Because in the context of how WT matches play fighting an Su-57 with R-74m, R-77-1/77M does not sound like a fun time in any gen 4 Also the Su-57 has an LDIRCM and we know how much everybody loves that on helicopters.
Explodes from Hawk 200 hype
Thanks Smin
djfahdlskjfhas
I’m so hyped AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
(Chance for a Indonesian 209 in the Japanese Tree? I love their blue Livery!)
Its a huge update for Britain this time )
6 Likes
Make me wonder if we will see ECM start to be introduced, would be best to test them with a strike fighter game mode imo.
1 Like
Too early to say specifics on what armament it will have I assume?
Also kind of surprised no indonesian 1 for Japan tbh, was very much expecting them to get 1 around the same time which would have been a lovely addon for them.
useless becoz PARS and TRIGAT self explode at 7km same with the spikes that selfexplode at 8km useless change.
1 Like
well, its hard to prove something which sadly didnt make it into service, but since its using normal hardpoints shoulnd it be atleast also possible to mount them on the wings?
Out of curiousity, do you have any knowledge about what the devs are planning with the SEPv1 and SEPv2?
We know they added LWS sensors to the visual model on the dev server, but nothing else is known. Is this something for the next major update or just the devs experimenting?
The models are still WIP, but its very unlikely they will have LWS functionality this major. The system for that on them needs further refinement. But its possible in the future perhaps.
4 Likes
I am quite literally vibrating with Excitement
The only time I’ll be this excited again would be the day FV101 finally gets added
@Smin1080p_WT Can we expect any changes to the PARS 3 and Spike missiles? The developers seem to be preparing to adjust them, but there are no noticeable differences so far. : )
1 Like
Welp time to ask, but now that the HP has been changed from 800 to 815 and the weight remains 35t. When is this model being used to replace the CV90120
Or is there an official answer cause its just silly they keep changing it to fit this model but refuse to add the actual vehicle those specifications are from
Again it makes no sense for the 2002 to weigh 35t nor have the 815hp engine
1 Like
There are no plans to change the model as far as im aware.
Any official response on the weight and why they have yet to respond to the accepted bug report which there are multiple sources showing its weight is 27t, again its clear they are getting their info from this model so i have no idea why they are changing it without explaining where they found counter info to the multiple sources showing they are confusing it with the 2006 Expo model
Again how they confused the Expo with this is beyond me
1 Like
If there was a response, we would update any report on that. As Ive covered before.
There are many reports that dont yet have a response. Sadly I cannot provide a reason for each and every one. Please be patient.
Well appreciate you checking, just a bit frustrating to see them continue to change it despite so much evidence pointing to them confusing it with a completely different model.
1 Like
Cv90120 is my fav vehicle in the game, and yet it got so much nerfs based on sources they normally dont accept as official
1 Like
Yeah i swapped to sweden for LT’s and enjoyed the 90120 quite a bit but it has no right at 12.0 especially when its slower than most MBT’s so ive just swapped to maining the other CV90s for now. Slowly researching the CV9035NL and once the Panzer 2000 goes to Germany ill have another CV90 to spade.
Just a shame seeing the 90120 just get worse with each patch. Oh well its not my favorite LT to play since the Tam exists but its close.
1 Like