no tank in game as far as I am aware has composite on the breach (most western MBT irl do) my assumption is because they dont want a certain nation that doesnt have composite on their breach being left behind
Bad for the game, as we dont get long range, hulldown, maps all that often. IRL they are made to be survivable, ensuring crew safty at all times, this means being able to tank one shot to allow the crew to bail. The turret armour is massivly underperforming with it missing its breach and roof armour (which on a maybe not so unclassified picture shows contains composite). its also missing its spall liner which has a similar coverage to what the leos have in game.
By no means is it going to be good or meta, but it could be niche if all fixed. When you get that one map your tank is meant for, allowing you to actually have some fun. I just want my TES to be accurate so i can actually fight in towns, allowing me to fight againt the IFV hoard as the side armour should prevent the russian aphe rounds from penning as well as most, if not all, atgms from penning due to the side “ERA” being a sandwhich of multiple layers of era and composite elements, making it immune to the tandem effect as its similar to the modernas era where its got multiple layers.
either way the whole argument is dumb because both sides have asked for the world and honestly its just funny watching what I assume is german mains go into full denial mode when you use the phrase “stop asking for the world”
1 Like
@Godvana So here is an example
If a group of 3 people ask for a Polish F-16s for Germany out of 20 who want a Swiss Hornet.
Does that give me the right to say all German players asking for the world because of one F-16 ?
difference is germany has no sub nations
UK has already 2 and are asking for even more nations
tbf you would note at least for some of the people here we have asked for Canada and Australia INSTEAD of SA and India
1 Like
That’s not the question the question is does that give me the right to paint the whole of the German player base because of a group of 3 people wanting ?
yes, but thats not how it works
would not be asking the worls, since its to few nations
With not that much of a diversity compared to what happens to UK
you have to admit tho that India and SA were dumb choices for Sub trees
1 Like
Just say yes or no
i cant because its different situations
Its just not equal to the Leopard 2A7V, 122 or BVM. But hopefully a decompression will fix that.
But challys all need some pretty major buffs.
We have 2 we didnt want, and are now being bashed for asking for nations with we have alot more connections with?
1 Like
that fits most sub trees, benelux was a weird choice as well as a whole
Dumb maybe, still it is what it is.
yes, because you arent dealing with the hand you have been handed.
yeah in an ideal world SA could have been an independent tree or even a BRCKS tree with Brazil and India
and the UK got Canada and Australia since they have far closer ties to the UK then SA and India
1 Like
Leave the SA alone, it is quite cool
(still mad ZA-HVM is not fit into the game)
We have 3 vehicles from india? thats as many vehciels you have from canada, so does that mean you have a canadian sub tree now? its just a bit stupid you saying we are asking for the world when you already have a sub tree of your own in your won eyes. were asking for jets that are native to countries that are not tied to any other in game as of yet. and we dont want to see something that should have gone to us go to others due to technicalities.
its a panther 2 ,flakpanzer etc situation