What? I’m simply applying the same standard to everyone.
That reminds me that we could receive a premium version of the TAM 2CA2 with M900… and shielding modules…
It would be a good premium to go with the 2A4 CAN.
1 Like
What does that have to do with the G variant of the Maverick, again? You’ve failed to provide evidence of SAF using that (or of anything that would indicating they’ve Maverick on service) each and every time.
im yet to see anyone else get triple MAV rails so its not the same standard
i should explain this, today germany ordered tranche 5 Eurofighters, the shown version is being advertised with PIRATE and AMK kit. Until now AMK was only put on german test planes. And no other nation equipped it yet. This is the first time both are seen together. And the combination ends up being that germany has the best EF a good bit better then UKs version as example
1 Like
what is PIRATE?
next tam should be either the VCA 155, VCTP or VCLC. The VCTP should be tech tree though
IRST and AMK is an aero dynamic kit increasing manoverability and take of lift even further
oh neat fair enough, well either way we are probably like 2 maybe 3 years from seeing a trenche 4 or 5 EFT lol
It’s just a different degree of fairness application. France has missiles on their Tigers they couldn’t use due to a lack of guidence equipment (but gets them for balance), Italy has APFSDS rounds that in real life would blow Ariete’s cannon apart (again, same reason as French Tigers’), SAF Gripen received A2A and A2G weaponary they never actually had etc (and again).
At this point I don’t get what’s your problem honestly. We just want what’s about to become the absolute worst top tier jet to be just a tiny bit better, how come it’s triggerring you so much?
1 Like
jup, germany still is supposed to get 38 tranche 4 EF, before we get the 20 tranche 5
Id not be surprised if the UK ordered similar, but it will probably be sometime next year with the general election soon. Unless they dump all their funds into Tempest instead (or whatever its called these days)
its not triggering me, I just dont see why you feel an A2A platform needs better ground ordinance, it would be like me saying oh well the JAS39C only gets 4 mavs but the F16C can get 6 so I should get 6 because idk I already have mavs that we may or may not use.
its just a dumb argument, and again apparently smin said they are already looking at giving it better mavs so I dont see why you are still arguing for this, you guys are literally getting the buffs you want and then ask for ahistorical buffs
1 Like
Look the bought the rails for Mavricks
You don’t get rails for something you don’t have
Ask Gunjob he did the report i think
Because F-4F is like, super duper bad at basically everything? Your comparison doesn’t hold water cause y’know, Gripen is actually good. Y’all asked for Leopard 2s due to “Challenger 2 bad” after all.
I wouldn’t even be bothering myself with this jet if we actually received ARG F-16AMs this patch, but here we are.
and we didnt get it? thats kinda a shitty comparison yourself buddy lol
1 Like
It’s an excellent comparison, since you’re arguing with us over something you had done yourself… but okay budddyyyyy.
2 Likes
what? you compared it to something we asked for and didnt get? so by you saying your just asking for the same standard you wouldn’t get it lol
1 Like
Sure, give the link to the report.
It’s irrelevant whether you got it or not, the point is that you’re for some reason angry over us applying your own logic and methods to what we want. Look, we have no idea if we’ll get what we want or not, however by all means we’re allowed to bring up the ‘issue’ up and talk about it.
Why’s it a problem all of a sudden, huh?