can you put both stat cards so we can compare?
I think the stat cards reflect same. One second, I am logging back on to grab it for you.
Only Brittain gets Bs interestingly & also the Darter. I tried darter its very good. Also, Britain gets the ultimate Mig-21? Just no R-77s. I think its a great patch for the tech tree.
Going back to work, gotta get that overtime lol
2 Likes
We didn’t buy the MiG29, but we had a better Su27 and a better Su30
1 Like
@Smin1080p Just two questions and I’m not sure if they were already asked before.
- In the devblog it was stated that the Leopard 2A4M Can had better thermal sights, yet it has gen 1 on the gunner and NVD on the commander, any info regarding this?
- The JAS39 Gripen should be able to carry Fox-3 on the wing tips, as the mount is larger for that exact purpose, but on the devserver you can only mount 4 on the wings, but not the wing tips, any info on this?
yeah the same stat card. They chose the B for the British that’s why.
Jk, hopefully they are different in performance.
From now on you shall be known as Moby Dick
2 Likes
Hmm i could change my nickname
it has the completely wrong engines for its model i covered it in a diff thread, but it never had standard 220 engines in any post 2000’s C model
the early C’s had the 220E
the post 2000s C (like the one ingame) ran the 229 engine
2 Likes
Thank you! As long as it’s known & you started the dialogue.
Hopefully it gets fixed.
1 Like
i really hope so too, i think the F-15s get more inaccurate the more they add them lmao
2 Likes
Anyone know if the challenger 2s camo netting was changed to 3d or if gaijin just ignored that again…
Rich man
I’m sat at about 5.5k GBP all in for 5-6 years of playing myself. I used to work nights and basically just played wt while not at work lmao
Yeah, it’s weird I am Soviet Main & Flanker fanatic, but it’s so dumb not to give the Americans a fighter without some major flaw. It offers no fun or challenge & gets boring.
They model the F-15 to rip. literally one of the most durable platforms ever…
The Aim7 control fins reset to neutral when lock is dropped so hinders ability to connect if lock is reacquired, they detonate immediately if left to long (though the Aim7M has an autopilot computer)…
So many more things but I digress.
Aim-9M had its range reduced to that of the R73. When the Aim9L & M’s tactical advantage is range.
The F-14 is a whole other story…
All western HMS radars cannot lock under the most ideal conditions as OEPS on the Soviets can immediately lock everything even further than the ACM 10km range.
An exploit that came to the game at the SMT release, GJ immediately removed & actually added it back in with the auto adjust feature that actually limits western radars even more.
All you have to do is lock a target with IRST & switch over to radar & there you go immediate acm radar lock beyond 10km no issue & up to 20km at times.
Funny thing is… The truth is no Soviet Mig-29s can actually use the OEPS 29 to command the radar to look around & lock with HMS. It was only for IR missiles… It’s using a modified Mig-23ML radar dish. same with the First Su-27 (Due to struggling economics of the Soviet Union 1980).
5 Likes
That sucks, I hope everything end up good.
I really thought it was going to be a premium, but hey, wouldn’t be an addition to the French tree without something wrong
Honestly I hope it means they’ll give the CR2 camo nets a pass, they’re not what you’d call, good
1 Like
well no longer rich I guess
also, F4F ICE didnt get a modernised RWR and neither a bombing or rocket ballistic computer
4 Likes
WIP, can always change we gotta wait and see for that one, it was a later upgrade so gajin might have decided to change minds
make a bug report is the best i can say
1 Like
iirc they’re the same for now. Which personally I think is better because then balancing is a smidge easier
1 Like