The J-8F has poor energy retention, making it very difficult to engage in combat with many fourth-generation fighters. And 12.3 with just two additional PL-12s. the rest is PL-5B and PL-8? don’t make me laugh. a PL-8 with flare resistance inferior to even a 9L will have difficulty fighting even its own class. 12.3 is an excessive rating. 12.0 is more appropriate.
It is strange that they havent released an A-10C along with the su25’s, and its not like US helis are even relevant in their own competition
A-4M is also very very very delayed
its dev server so what you expecting
true, so true
How is it that the AAM-4, which is significantly different in size from the AIM-120, has the same warhead weight? Could this number be a placeholder? Considering its diameter, it should have a warhead weight similar to that of the AIM-7.
“balance”
Big report time
(It’s all classified lmao)
every single DERBY fanboy is writing 50 page reports as we speak rn
Unless they do it like they did the F-15C and limit how many it can carry. It’s so weird that the 15C can only carry 4 when others are carrying 6…
What’s with the Belgian F-16A getting AIM-9M’s at 12.0 lmao? I just noticed that.
the funny
because it has no aim-7
F-16C carrying 6 is laughable, considering its arguably a “better” pick to the F-15C (which should have a weaker FM to the F-15A)
But we’ll see
It currently seems to be a AIM-120A C&P, while its supposed to be close to AIM-120C-5 in e.g. kinetic performance (100km launch range, dual-stage motor…).
3 Likes
9.3 is where the 35 should be and the 30 should be 8.3 maybe 8.7
1 Like
Imagine that…
Drops aim-120C-5 manual
no IFF on ICE confirmed
3 Likes
Does not justify it at all honestly. I’d much, much rather have the AIM-9M’s than the Sparrows.
Germany moment