We will see in about 5 hours
Third plane in the game with a hornet RWR signature btw
Pacifica specifically mentioned Australia and the Commonwealth nations as their example in response to someone inquiring about how Gaijins stance would affect the chances of an Yugoslavian Techtree ever being added
1 Like
Some keep asking for an Australian Tech Tree… but, that is pretty much something like 75% C&P from US and British equipment…
1 Like
Australia has always had many unique vehicles available for the British tree many ignored so far. Australia has always modified and customised their equipment. Tin Australia alone there is plenty Australian equipment to contribute to the British and the same for the combined commonwealth nations. To say otherwise shows a big lack of research or interest on this topic.
2 Likes
The Su-39 is the only model available since it has the kopyo pod. But its already miserable so no point to make its BR even higher.
2 Likes
100%
Forgetting Israel is a thing lol
5 Likes
I mean, AC series tanks, Land Rover WOMBAT (it will be funny, he says), MM13 with the scorpion turret, I’m not particularly versed in Aussie tech but there’s also the Boomerangs too, so its nowhere near copypaste. Can definitely stitch together a tree with various modifications and changes to different tanks
1 Like
No? Su39 could, but sm3 doesnt even have the radar pod.
But he said in his response Australian stuff is almost all copy paste which isn’t true. As I said we have made many unique variations of other nations equipment. It wouldn’t be copy paste.
2 Likes
I am an Australian… I know all about it…
6 Likes
Not a tree. Most Aussies aren’t asking for a tree just to contribute to the British tree where we belong. Canadians also feel the same as far as I’ve seen.
1 Like
Then do better mate. Your showing a deep lack of understanding on what our defence industry has done over the last century.
1 Like
Lisan al gszabi
1 Like
The ANZACs might struggle to be a TT but they aren’t 100% C&P.
Why because like Canada, Australia does a lot of licensed building. AKA domestically built variants of other vehicles.
A Canada-Australia-New Zealand tree wouldn’t be C&P unless Gaijin themselves make it C&P. Why? Between them, there is plenty of domestic stuff and licensed built/modified stuff from other nations.
And there are always chances down the road… but, there have been numerous people that wanted a dedicated Aussie Tree…
1 Like
I suppose we have different stance on what defines a nations identity ingame.
When copy paste stuff complements a nations lineup it’s fine, no questions about that, but when it gets to the point that almost every nation has a copy of certain vehicles everything starts to feel same-y
any more today?
Enough of your Trolling and nonsense now…
9 Likes