But would be more fair for the new SU22 would be the newer variant of the A10. Do you think that would be more equal than the F15E?
Aight let’s see if we get a teaser…
2 Likes
yama is thicker yes but the japanese steel industry wasnt as advanced as the brits so the steel was of poor quality
1 Like
Yes if I was ranking FM’s it would be Gripen, F-16C and then F-15 following closely behind.
Gripen is exceptionally good probably the F-5E of 12.7 but if the F-5E was 10.3.
1 Like
AFAIK we are not getting any new SU-22. I feel like you are confusing the Su-27 Flanker with the Su-22, which is a variant of the Su-17.
No im talking about the newer SU22. The one with the 40km air to ground missile. It has been in the game for a little bit now, but is still fairly new.
Misconception and stereotype. Japan was doing well in this regard and even had improvements. No wonder the British themselves taught them
21 Likes
You mean the Su-25SM3?
Yes. :( im stupid.
So dope but only carriers 2 Aim120 :(
Or should see what Canada did when it had nukes.
(strap then on anything they could get to carry them. So yes early Canadian Starfighters where nuclear delivery platforms.)
up to 4 (2 on the wings, two on the belly)
Spoiler
and if you want 6 missiles you can only have 2 amraam
Spoiler
You could always get in touch with RNAS Culdrose to ask about their inboard pylon missile mountings
I am as well it would be so awesome to see it in-game
1 Like
I wonder if we can hope for the USAF S/N 71-0290 for a top 4th gen dogfighter for US? Maybe as an event vehicle.
1 Like
4 max in theory, I can see 3 being pretty common with 2x Aim9M on the remaining wing.
But should be plenty, at least if it’s a reasonable BR. And more than enough for SB
1 Like
Yeah imagine being able to use the JDAM, AGM-130, JTACMS, or glide bombs. The range of use for these weapons would be insane.
Which is likely why we won’t see any of those weapons anytime soon.