ehh, imo the current CM count works fine, I rarely run out of flare or chaff. Just don’t spam needlessly lol.
Well with how much some nation mains hype up their playerbases you would think it’s not a wild assumption.
But I have yet to be impressed.
sarcasm
While at it could you please take a look at this report?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lzVwJiWv7mRp

I mean, I don’t play ground that often, but German/Sweden players are IMO up there. Sure, the odd USSR rolfstomp at top tier explicitly due to their SPAA/CAS is… eye opening, but still.
@Smin1080p_WT the German Boxer sWaTrginf got a spall liner on the dev server, can you please confirm the other Boxers will be getting this? They should all have it, especially the Australian Land 400 Boxer since that is literally the one in the brochure that states it has a spall liner.
The report is bumped to confirm its still valid for the current game version.
On the topic of spall liners, the Dragoon is missing its spall liners (as well as the M1128). For having the level of armor that it does, I feel as if spall liners should be an important thing to have equipped.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4UWXiXZMsNMh
There is a report for these two, but it has not yet been completed.
Will there be more SPAA’s for other nations since the Pantsir SM-SV is now added, or will it be the same just like the Pantsir S1 and we have to wait half a decade to get more SPAA’s for other nations?
Bro, it seems to me that the mechanics of composite air defense systems is a whole field for adding new technology, and therefore we are likely to see a lot of air defense systems.
I have absolutely horrible experience with German players at top tier in ground RB, especially as teammates, but maybe that is just my luck.
Germany could have already gotten the Skyranger 30 or 35, or other nations could’ve gotten something as well (i dont exactly what). but this is getting out of hand, dont get me wrong, I love technology, and so I love the way the new Pantsir looks, but adding it now was to early!
what about the 3rd Boxer?
we have:
Boxer MGS
Vilkas
Boxer CRV
surely the Schwerer Waffenträger isnt done yet, right?
because its still missing the rear Spall-liner around the door (the door itself seems to not have spall-liner)
around the door

wierd missing part

Please excuse me for the direct question @Smin1080p_WT however I must ask, are there any intentions from the developers to fix the newly implemented Digital ADI (Attitude Director Indicator) for modern NATO aircraft?
I’ve of course filed a report regarding it, however it hasn’t been addressed yet so far.
Here are a few images for reference:
Thank you.
Here you can see it quite well:

It’s just the ramp and door that don’t have a liner as far as I can tell;

Roughly this part should be entirely covered by the liner:

Note: not all pictures show CRV’s (only those with the vehicle that has the “signature Rheinmetall demo” camo, however the liner layout is the same with the sole exception being the roof depending on the variant and the associated hatches/turrets fitted.
currently trying to push armor buffs too, since there is enough evidence for at least the 2 boxer CRV’s to have level 6 and maybe the other ones getting it too
On another matter, is there a special reason or technical limitation why the spike launchers on the KF41 / Schwerer Waffenträger and similar are not allowed to be adjusted elevation wise?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/eqqt3XTUl723
Community Bug Reporting System ( This one still needs to get accepted)

Last question would be if increasing the amount ammo and spikes is still considered for the boxer.
Its not a troop transport its a fire support vehicle. It getting the same amount of spikes is just weird,
specialy cause the Freccia can get 10 for whatever reason. Compared to the 4 of the boxer.
The mechanic doesn’t exist yet for ATGM launchers.






