Hi @Smin1080p_WT any word this update if the F-15I will be getting its LITENING TGP and or SPICE 250s and 1000s?
I’m pretty sure it was accepted a little over a year ago now
1 Like
Your own sources on this currently do not agree here and conflict. The report has received a response that it requires more information and sources to confirm your claim.
Thats a little bit of an overexageration regarding a name, which is actually correct according to multiple sources.
Not currently.
1 Like
darn, thank you
Could you 100% confirm that the Challenger 2;s had their Gear ratios changed?
I’m 100% certain they have but there has been no update on the report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/d1OZ86M9Mkau
In addition i noticed in the datamines the F-86K has its G limits fiddled with, but not to the correct figures?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TlqqYcyqdP2n
Could you confirm if those changes are with this report or some other report that I am unaware of?
Apart from the incorrect name, the plane also has an incorrect maximum speed.
1 Like
No report currently exists on that.
Additionally stat cards may not be correct. Aircraft performance should be tested directly with a fully upgraded Aircraft.
The report was resolved internally a couple of months ago. So there has been a change yes.
1 Like
So, for now, we should hold off on writing a report on the plane’s maximum speed? Because I don’t know if it’s worth doing.
New “Sturmtiger”
7 Likes
You can make a report, it just needs to be tested properly with the aircrafts actual performance and fully upgraded. Stat cards are not always correct.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT
can you maybe forward this please :)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/MB7HB21F3jOy
I noticed that the Hawk 200 got a detailed dm added to it, is there any word of that coming to the 200 RDA and the 209 too?
2 Likes
any reason why the Centauro II is referred to as a prototype model?
Probably so that they can release the production version later as a seperate vehicle.
2 Likes
I’m pretty sure this IS the production version though? unless they plan to add a 105 variant at some point?
Is it planned or considered for aircraft at Rank IX to be given stock chaff?
Since historically, when a new Rank is added, it is usually customary that stock grind is improved to account for the gameplay meta at the new rank. Such as for:
- Rank VII Aircraft: Stock IR missiles
- Rank VIII Aircraft: Stock Radar missiles
- Rank VIII Ground: Stock APFSDS
The relevant thread has not seen any official statement or response yet.
9 Likes
This is a flawed reasoning. I could say the same thing about any modern missiles in game.
But, just like every other missiles, the Aim120 is subject to the same reporting standards of using open source documentation.
Which you will never get.
Go and look at 9X there is no accurate data on that missile. We see figures of 50G and 75G
Nothing official
Do you believe the 120 hasnt changed in 20 years?
US mains are going to endure this because as mentioned US public data released for capabilities is always understated.
We had PAC 2 Patriot hit an EAWCS at a range greater than it’s maximum publicly listed range.
3 Likes