Major Update "Ninth Wave" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

I mean why not just go for the optical tracking and LRF as a stop-gap solution in the meantime?
Those two things were previously reported and the sources provided should be more than sufficient for the purpose.

I believe that’d be a better solution than not doing anything and leaving it as a subpar spaa at the same br.

Missing LRF Report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SYYKuwQiQf1Q

Missing Lead Indicator (optical tracking) Report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SXHi6awMTul4
(note: was NAB’d due to the LRF not being present ingame, report for the LRF missing is linked above)

3 Likes

Thank to these new stupid changes i cannot access to my good old Aim-120B’s and now i have to grind them again.

I wonder who thought it was a good idea to remove access to the missile that was grinded and force you to grind the same missile again?

1 Like

Hello Smin, hope you’re having a good day. I see that you commented that the PL-12A is not configured yet. I must ask, is the AIM-120D configured yet? Also, is there consideration to making it into the AIM-120D-3 variant?

I feel like the devs are just gonna abandon it like they did with the Cr2 fixed they promised years ago

@Smin1080p_WT could you please clarify what Gaijins plans for the J-15T’s cockpit are? As its almost complely unknown

Its tank seems leak in low altitude if u wep

@Smin1080p_WT Do you know if the ASH (APS-4) is currently being worked on in the dev? It has this wonky radar hud:

Spoiler

Hello @Smin1080p_WT , sorry for tagging you! I’ve got a technical question;

Do you know if the turret basket on Leclerc provides any sort of protection to the turret crew members against the flames that may ignite from the floor fuel tank, or would that be way too specific/outside the realms of modeling?

Gaijin should directly replace the old ones for players with new ones, rather than confiscating the old ones and forcing them to grind for another.

it is a little odd since for a long time people have complained about the Stormer being bad or really inconsistent idk why they didnt just give it LMM

2 Likes

Exactly, now i have to grind the same missile and suffer in order regain my capabilities.

Honestly its bs.

Please report any issues with it.

Looking at the Leos/Abrams, nope you only get a blocked turret and more spall gets created if it gets hit

The module research is being consolidated into two modules rather than 3 seperate AMRAAM upgrades.

Who can tell me… that really?
Why a range is 40km’s msl run at 30 km have 4 mah? I know this msl max speed is 5 mah . But how colud its energy storage be so good ?
23EDB60138D3A81A81F3E979009E4623

1 Like

hi @Smin1080p_WT , is it known if the aircraft statcards are final or will there be more to come in the near future?

Everything is subject to change. However as always, if you think somethings performance is not correct, it is best to report it.

1 Like

Yeah and now thanks to that decision i have to grind the same missiles once again.

Guess suffering one time wasnt enough in Gaijin’s eyes.

Its the same as existing turret basket modelling.

If you already have the C, you now get A, B and C.

If you are saying you dont yet have the C, then even if we added the D as a new 3rd AMRAAM module, you would need to research 3 modules. So it would not be different the other way around.