So it isn’t the worst and they commented nothing about the other 2 SPAA. One of the fixes they could have done was to remove multipath for radar missiles as well, which would have given it a leg up compared to IRIS-T SLM which is currently the “best”.
Also, it should be noted that statshark does not count munitions destroyed currently, and Buk would have done better in that regard than the IRIS-T SLM.
at what what point did I even mention MWW in that? im talking about how the brimstone 1 never reaches its max range and hopefully we get brimstone 2 so we can get a brimstone that can reach 20km
If it was a game convention matter, all would be set to the same level (such as with multipath).
Smin, pls maybe?
Is there a reason that this takes 2+ years or even more? I would add the third option: It was forgotten and/or nobody wants to do it so it gets consequently ignored. Otherwise there would be something somewhere but there is nothing heard of anywhere. There are many open reports 2+ years and older which were accepted but never acted on. It gives the impression that the “accepted” label was in these cases just given to satisfy the community in the hopes it gets forgotten down the line. It’s not like these reports aren’t given or nudged to the according mods so we can safely assume these are just getting batantly ignored by the devs.
Btw, you can see how they used to compare SAMs in the past which was much better than whatever they’re doing now
So i could report, say the roland (im making it up but its an example) having its proxy fuse activate only above 40m and that would be accepted and eventually fixed
second REALLY important question, are we besties?
He’s right though, they didn’t nerf Brimstone upon introduction of the missile so they can get away with that statement.
If sources support that, then yes. It cannot just be reported on the basis of what it is compared to something else.
excellent, thank you
sad we arent besties tho :(
This was talked about before:
thats not a good picture, the su-30 does not have dual pylons on it
its a weird perspective, that second r77 is on the intake
Yeah unfortunately nothing can be done about it unless Smin can get your feedback of the photo added to Fantom’s report.
I understand about the double pylon. Now I’d like to know the source confirming the existence of the Kh-38MT.
I’m not trying to pick a fight. I’m simply curious.
There was a big thread on this. Kh-38ML exists, the seeker of Kh-38MT exists, it’s compatible. That’s probably all unfortunately.
This is funny as the devs constantly demonstrate their lack of aerodynamic understanding by narrowing down the maneuverability of missiles only to the size of their control surfaces and if they have TVC or not.
Greetings smin, may we know how much RP&SL will tier9 plane cost?
The biggest complaint of the brimstone in game is it’s Laser only and the laser mode is what limits it to its range in game, you can hit targets at max range with the right speed and alt but SPAA will have you out of the air by then anyway.
Also IIRC Brimstone 2 has been denied due the MMW as I mentioned before!
Hi smin,
is there any update on the Bardelas/60mm HVMS ammo layout and missing autoloader bug report?
what does it mean if it got accepted, but is still open? is there any plans to implement this?
the whole point of the bardelas hvms, is to test the weapon system, the gun and the autoloader, kinda weird that it wasnt implemented.
Why can’t you guys add the I-derby ER?
