An actual change to the Ariete’s armor composition? I’m definitely losing it
2 Likes
you are not tweaking it’s true XD
With tha red hms too, cool indeed.
top tier cas for the usa is extremely horrible your best chance for killling tanks spaa are with gbu 39s which are gnss and laser jdams …every one else has atleast an ir glide bomb or missile that “kinda” works…gbu 53 stormbreaker has been in the files for a long time why not just add it to the planes that can carry it (super hornet and the strike eagle) @Smin1080p_WT
8 Likes
Luckily it has been suggested but I would like to advocate for the addition of this vehicle into the game.
1 Like
But it does have HOBS and could do this, just not if the target is close.
OH, look at that!
They are reworking the Arietes, including remade armor and the addition of modules!!
Let me have a closer look; hopefully the armor will be fixed soon… thank you for the heads up, I hadn’t spotted this!
If they fix the Arietes, I may consider purchasing Certezza and RGO during the next sale!
1 Like
depends how much is the KE amount tho
2 Likes
Indeed!
Thus far, it all appears to be placeholder values, as the X ray texts remain unchanged; but I assure right here… if the armor ends up fixed, I WILL purchase those Premiums and grind Italy!
THEY ARE ADDING THE COMPOSITES TO THE HULL, even! And the turret may turn out strudier.
I always estimated about 450mm KE for the turret without WAR, and about 580mm KE with WAR. For the hull, probably around 400mm KE.
I hope the final results align with my expectations!
So far, even WIP, hull is 50mm stronger (300 vs 250) and the cheeks are 20ish mm stronger. The hull composite armor also extends a bit lower into the lower plate, as it’s thicker.
1 Like
Man i hope it is as you say…
1 Like
Can you see how much KE the turret provides with WAR? Since I do not have it I can not equip WAR.
That way we may see if they are finally fixing WAR too! It would be one of the biggest changes.
1 Like
What’s very clear about this is that the actual capability of the HOBS is stated absolutely nowhere, aside from the fact that there is indeed HOBS capability. The missile is already capable of shooting someone off the shoulder, just in a large circle.
Once again, there’s no information on what exactly HOBS means in this situation.
1 Like
i seen them in hangar view, i deliberately don’t have them 'XD
There were some changes to the SEAD/Strategic Bombing targets:
New composite target sites, and changes to the existing S-75 sites:
Tochka 's missile arm now sits upright by default, and the internals were reworked:
AN/MPQ-53 is now animated, it can rotate horizontally:
Nebo 55J6 is now animated, it can rotate around the horizontal ( three storey building jumpscare )
5N64S " Big Bird " is now animated, it can rotate around the horizontal:
5N63S " Flap Lid " had it 's internals reworked, but it isn’t animated yet:
S-300PS FINALLY has it 's internals !! Also, the missile siloes sit upright now:
AN/TPS-43 is now animated, it rotates around the horizontal:
M270 MLRS now has internals:
M752 launcher 's missile arm now sits upright, and it has an incomplete animated version that is currently not animated:
Grad internals have been changed for the third or fourth time atp:
and finally
P-37 radar is now animated, rotates around horizontal:
5 Likes
And yet, every other Fox 3 has magical HOBS, but not the AMRAAM. Interesting stuff
1 Like
Every other fox 3, being the fox 3 who all have much higher proven G loads, ranging from 40 to 50G (and with TVC for MICA) ? Who could have guessed that missiles that turn better than the AIM120, do in fact turn better than the AIM120 ?
2 Likes
Yea cuz 3 G matters on the PL-12, or 5 for the Derby and others that have 40Gs.
It’s the seeker delay and fin AOA, which was alright for the first time on the Dev for the AIM-120A and B, and then it got butchered. Same for the C-5. But hey, it’s impossible that the Americans make good planes or missiles.
3 Likes