Ideally other gaming news publications would be ideal. I am sure the next couple of days will see more War Thunder CC’s cover it.
2 Likes
huh I guess they did change how it works
@Smin1080p_WT I would like to apologise for before I wasnt aware it had been changed and that you can now do this, im willing to admit when im wrong and I am sorry
1 Like
Honestly, at this point, I think we are beyond the point of just some YouTuber. Gaijin has just gotten too sloppy with everything they do. Why prioritize infantry over submarines when War Thunder has always been about vehicles? Why are they so hesitant to make any response to the VT-4 issue? They had a whole Q&A and they still glossed over it. Why has the content per update not increased as the years go on? Why such a priority on modern things? As a community we deserve better.
9 Likes
So @Smin1080p_WT , I would like to know, as part of the issue report, why you just accept a part of it, but it is still missing 45mm cannon?Even though you just accpet that
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RXnaMMhyg4Eh
At least I can hear Ash’s voice as he has sound takes without getting too personal with people, while TEC just throws a wrecking ball half way across the room while crying victim.
Another issue I thought of, bug reports. It is so hard to wrap my mind around the idea of a bug report being around for even a month, let alone YEARS, especially since some of the bugs are just dumping on a vehicles performance. How is it possible to see a bug report around for years and just be like “we’ll get around to it”. How is it possible to add a vehicle in an update missing some of its features? These updates are allegedly planned a year out, so how can you plan on adding something and then forget some of its key features? Do you guys do no research? How do you get stats wrong? Why is it up to the players to make up for your mistakes? Why are bug reports being cherry picked?
easy, just ground pound and he can do nothing on the deck cuz the airframe is so weak also no gun
Too much 25 can do nothing at all if you actually see how it flies
They can say they have submitted as a suggestion, and then maybe 3-5 years later add that
1 Like
should be folded with oplot but there is a gap between m60 and oplot
is this the first time this has shown up
1 Like
Watch them give it the better reverse speed when there is almost no evidence for it, while they keep shooting down stuff for NATO vehicles because “not enough info”.
Still want to know why they can get M1A2T but we can’t Thai VT-4
5 Likes
Can you explain it more for me? Thanks
The US Army issued them to the 82nd Airborne before cancelling.
The short answer is that with the exception of the T1s that lack the necessary power supplies (if im remembering correctly) to recieve CAPTOR-E, all Typhoons can and were simply upgraded.
Tranche/Block less denotes what they have, but rather when they were built.
The current airframe in-game (with CAPTOR-M) could be considered just a T1/T2s that have been upgraded to Tranche 3 P3E (as they have Brimstones)
Likewise, many T2s will be upgraded to the P4E standard with CAPTOR-E.
So just because its X Tranche and Block, doesnt necessarily exclude it from any upgrades.
This is a good thread for all the various upgrades and Types
Tranches
The Tranches are mere production contracts for the production and delivery of a defined number of aircraft and engines to the contracting nations over a contractually agreed delivery schedule. It’s a wide spread misconception that Tranches translate into capabilities. This is not the case! Tranches are only indirectly related to capabilities as all aicraft are ofcourse build to a specific standard. However the capabilities were layed out in the WSPS and not the Tranche contracts!
Batches
The Tranches are divided into Batches and further broken down into Blocks. The purpose of the Batches was to segregate distinctively different build standards by managing them in Batches. This concept effectively applied only for Tranche 1 and was merely superseded by Tranches 2 & 3A as the aircraft build under the latter Tranches were too similar to each other in contrast to earlier plans. As a consequence there were 4 Batches.
Blocks
The Block represents the exacting build standard of an aircraft. It is possible to link capabilities to the baseline configuration of a particular Block, but that was only valid to a specific point in time. Earlier Blocks have always been upgraded to higher standards equivalent to newer Blocks. The Block numbers haven’t changed, however, and unlike in other aircraft programmes Blocks in the Eurofighter programme are not really indicative in terms of capabilities, other than at a particular point in time when these aircraft were build.
Yeah, so many people hear “stopping further acquisitions” or “No longer procuring,” and just immediately assume the all ready acquired vehicles are sent to the void or something, (some are but not most if they have at least over 10-20 made.)
1 Like
What I really can’t understand is this: the USSR can use the KH-38, but U.S. aircraft still can’t use the GBU-53, AGM-154C, or AGM-158
The AGM-154C and AGM-158 were even introduced earlier than the KH-38, yet somehow we’re not allowed to get them
1 Like
The TT can get an AH-64E and a M1A2T two modern vehicles but we can’t get a proper Flag to represent the nation that holds on to those? Japan can’t receive the VT4?
Spoiler
Tell me your company is pandering without telling me your company is pandering.
3 Likes
hey morvan what was the main british fighter before EF2000?