Time to spade the best looking F/A-18 in the game!
8 Likes
We should get MiG-25PDZ in TT. I read on Ruslet that it had limited thrust vectoring + KDS-155 and SPO-15.
https://ruslet.webnode.cz/technika/ruska-technika/letecka-technika/a-i-mikojan-a-m-i-gurjevic/mig-25pdz/
1 Like
With Israel having no viable 14.3 jet this update surely they could just slap on some better missiles to an existing airframe like the F-16I or F-15I and call it a day.
I’m starting grinding Japan again just for this twin seater beauty
and that paint scheme it’s sick I love it
And we’re right.
Well that will be nice if we get the KD-88 for the J-10C
If we don’t suddenly see like 10 to 15 vehicles appear on the dev server we can already kind of tell that infantry in fact does take away from it
2 Likes
If it opens up more reason for cluster bombs or anti personnel ordnance to facilitate new targets, I’ll put up with infantry. Eventually they have to listen 😿
Is there something from grpien e in there?
I’m not sure if the engine will ever be able to handle those
Maybe, MW-1s and JP233 would have a looooot of value
back at it with premiums with all aspect at a low br…
Because Cio (otomelara-iveco), unlike most of the other company actually stated the number of spike the vehicle is capable of carring
A10A all over again
2 Likes
This is how it will be in game.
3 Likes
If its gonna stay at 10.3 we’ll have another example of Anti-British bias
in an ARB/ASB context, I can almost forgive them for it being a lower BR.
Edit, after seeing it only has 2x Aim-9-4, then the BR in that regard is fine
But in GRB? Extremely unfair. 2x AGM-65Gs + 2x Aim-9-4s + 2 free hard points at a lower BR than the 200 which get AGM-65Bs and has to give up AGMs to take A2A.