My first bug report submitted for PoW :D
@Smin1080p_WT is there any specific reason as to why the new BMPTs are classed as Anti-Tank Missile Carriers (Tank Destroyers) but the Namers aren’t?
Ingame the Namer RCWS-30 and Namer IFV are both classed as “Light Tanks” despite weighing nearly 20 tons more than then and being just as adequately armed in terms of firepower. If it’s final is there anyway this logic could be revisited, because having ammo boxes on the Namer, which is restricted to only 4 ATGMs, would be extremely helpful for a vehicle limited to a 30mm main gun at 11.3 (which is already crazy when you realize the newly added BMPTs are at 10.3 for now…).
7 Likes
WTF? F-18E have no JAGM? JAGM-F = Brimstone.
1 Like
So, what’s the actual difference between the Thai VT4 and the Thai branch in Japan? Why can’t it be added? You still haven’t answered the main point.
We need a direct answer, but you’re avoiding it.
3 Likes
It’s an earlier block of the F/A-18E. Will likely get a more advanced version later on with more A2G options and Litening
what br?
F-15E with SDB I? In game presented early modification.
Sad …
Smin 1080p not answer …
He might not be allowed to tbh, wouldn’t surprise me
1 Like
It’s 14.3 but I’m assuming the Block 3 will likely have all the bells and whistles is my guess. We got an earlier Block 2
So i was right its beyond cooked
G-wagon = Gaijin-wagon?
5 Likes
still DOA free delta wing food EFT and Rafale gonna eat it alive
1 Like
Everyone grinding the JP tech tree should be glad that Gaijin spared you from grinding the VT4. I can assure you you dont miss anything.
Yeah but it does help with the lineup though. In the China tree not as much but Japan could use some extra MBT’s
Also hoping to see more A2G armaments on the J-10C. I don’t know enough on the jet on what it can carry but I’m assuming it has more. It’s nice to see that the J-10C has the underbelly pylon for the two PL-12’s. No PL-15’s yet
1 Like
dev it’s already open?
Yes
1 Like
Mind telling me where USS south dakota is