Reminder to people its been a year since Arkhangelsk got added and the UK still dosen’t have a R class
1 Like
You have a subject now with over a 1000 comments (its like 1300 I think) on it and havent issued a single follow-up since it was made. You made a decision, players clearly left feedback, and we still haven’t heard from you or any other Gaijin staff. Im sorry, but respectfully you guys dont. Most of the time it comes across as these forum posts are shredder boxes that allow you to claim your listening.
6 Likes
Hey, @Smin1080p_WT, I really like the new “inside” hangar. Is this only available for premium vehicles?
Will you consider giving premium account holders access to this hangar to use with all ground and air vehicles?
Also Hungarian low tier air was supposed to be soon™ for a while now
1 Like
Sadly BRs cant be changed if the vehicles performance is saying the direct opposite of what’s being asked. All feedback of that kind is considered and changes are made from it. However just because something is asked for, doesn’t mean its possible.
Many people directly ask for these vehicles. Again, this may not be something you wish to see. But in some cases these are domestic variants or sub variants, not “copy paste”. Even those that may be similar, have likely also been asked for by some. So this is an opinion based matter.
Its also worth noting that such vehicles are not coming “instead of” or “rather than” domestic vehicles or other possible unique vehicles.
And yet the Chinese player base can throw a fit over the VT4 and immediately get an apology and a whole dev response from that one thing.
1 Like
Will the HQ-11 gets its CIWS secondary vehicle or is it stuck with the mediocre missile load?
1 Like
still waiting for F14D
1 Like
Still waiting for Polish tech tree
5 Likes
Unfortunately not every subject has an answer we can provide at all times.
Once again, because one example you can bring up does not have an answer does not negate all the other answers and feedback responses put out there.
Sadly I don’t seem to ever see you pick up or acknowledged on any of those, only circle on the negative side of posting.
Regardless, this is now off topic. Feel free to use a relevant open thread if there is a particular matter you wish to leave feedback on.
i mean it have a lot of russian and german
Did they mention the F-15SG at all?
I vaguely read that Israel received basically nothing interesting on the dev stream, just couldn’t read all the messages.
So after Russia, Japan can also use the KH-38, but the U.S. still doesn’t get the new air-to-ground weapons? The KH-38 entered service even later than the two air-to-ground weapons I mentioned, yet we still can’t use them?
Can you explain why Japan can’t get the VT-4, but China can get the M1A2T? (I hope you can also answer the M1A2T question and not avoid it.)
6 Likes
The 2 German vehicles in question are just Leopard’s but the tech tree would have a lot of soviet based stuff
F15sg is unlikely to go to Israel
either way have fun with the dev server hopefully we see HOSBO on both EFTs and hopefully we see the JAS39E at some point as well
Tbf, improved A2G for the EFTs armament was also heavily requested for the past year, and we saw no change in that so far. And its not like the devs dont have plenty suggestions to act on:
Spoiler
@Dontkev-psn I just noticed you’re missing one Community Bug Reporting System
2 Likes
Well the educated guesses list and CM disclosures blog disagrees with you.
This has already been answered. Its no different to existing vehicles found in the Chinese tree. Please do not continue to spam the topic.
they said Singapore would go to countrys that made them