Some people dont play to simply have “the best” vehicle possible. Some play because they want spesific vehicles or nations. That may be your style of play and thats ok, others have different reasons that are not meta focused.
1 Like
These two factors are not linked. Kh-38 was already an existing weapon in game.
Ikea fellas gonna lose it … like why is there a better rogue CV90 curb stomping our CV90s
It just feels like our feedback goes nowhere when there are BR changes, bug reports, or any other suggestions that have gone unnoticed for years.
Morvran has asked for the 11.7 tornados to go down in the last several BR change threads (with decent support), and nothing has come from it.
Harriers still have a sooty exhaust despite the bug report being accepted years ago.
Chinese MBTs are still missing their spall liners.
We are still getting tons of copy and paste each update.
3 Likes
I mean i guess but you guys did say the same thing for the mig 29 and f16 there was no reason to get it
Reminder to people its been a year since Arkhangelsk got added and the UK still dosen’t have a R class
1 Like
You have a subject now with over a 1000 comments (its like 1300 I think) on it and havent issued a single follow-up since it was made. You made a decision, players clearly left feedback, and we still haven’t heard from you or any other Gaijin staff. Im sorry, but respectfully you guys dont. Most of the time it comes across as these forum posts are shredder boxes that allow you to claim your listening.
6 Likes
Hey, @Smin1080p_WT, I really like the new “inside” hangar. Is this only available for premium vehicles?
Will you consider giving premium account holders access to this hangar to use with all ground and air vehicles?
Also Hungarian low tier air was supposed to be soon™ for a while now
1 Like
Sadly BRs cant be changed if the vehicles performance is saying the direct opposite of what’s being asked. All feedback of that kind is considered and changes are made from it. However just because something is asked for, doesn’t mean its possible.
Many people directly ask for these vehicles. Again, this may not be something you wish to see. But in some cases these are domestic variants or sub variants, not “copy paste”. Even those that may be similar, have likely also been asked for by some. So this is an opinion based matter.
Its also worth noting that such vehicles are not coming “instead of” or “rather than” domestic vehicles or other possible unique vehicles.
And yet the Chinese player base can throw a fit over the VT4 and immediately get an apology and a whole dev response from that one thing.
1 Like
Will the HQ-11 gets its CIWS secondary vehicle or is it stuck with the mediocre missile load?
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
6 Likes
still waiting for F14D
1 Like
Still waiting for Polish tech tree
5 Likes
Unfortunately not every subject has an answer we can provide at all times.
Once again, because one example you can bring up does not have an answer does not negate all the other answers and feedback responses put out there.
Sadly I don’t seem to ever see you pick up or acknowledged on any of those, only circle on the negative side of posting.
Regardless, this is now off topic. Feel free to use a relevant open thread if there is a particular matter you wish to leave feedback on.
i mean it have a lot of russian and german
Did they mention the F-15SG at all?
I vaguely read that Israel received basically nothing interesting on the dev stream, just couldn’t read all the messages.
So after Russia, Japan can also use the KH-38, but the U.S. still doesn’t get the new air-to-ground weapons? The KH-38 entered service even later than the two air-to-ground weapons I mentioned, yet we still can’t use them?
Can you explain why Japan can’t get the VT-4, but China can get the M1A2T? (I hope you can also answer the M1A2T question and not avoid it.)
6 Likes
The 2 German vehicles in question are just Leopard’s but the tech tree would have a lot of soviet based stuff