egypt / greece / iraq / israel should be all under turkish tree then.
1 Like
Are there still Russian players complaining about the SU-30SM2 now?
? ww2 not ww1 bro
Why people want every single nation to be represented or mention in the game, I really don’t understand.
it was about US, USSR, Britan after a while Japan, ok, new nations, no problem, but when I see Japan for example I want to know I am fighting Japan, or if I play for US, I want to know that the Sukhoys I see, are Russian(generally talking about SB, because there it’s really annoying to have the same jets in your team and the opposite team, because there are no marks and I don’t want to think twise if it’s for example Su-30 Japan enjoer or an actual normal Russian Su-30, because there when I play US, I know my enemies are Sukhoys, when I play Russia, I know my enemies are US and Triangle shaped anything)
I really don’t care about TRB, Air RB, specially in Air RB everything is always mixes, so everyone is against everyone
Idk, I am satisfied how Su-30SM2 performs, probably there are bunch of things that need to be done, but ok, I got what I wanted
ok nice so poland and ukraine should be under ussr tree then.
@THEPolishThunder might agree with you
because people from every country play this game and everyone wants their own country to be represented, its really not that hard to figure out bro
then i feel sorry for you and hope that gaijin can do something about the matchups because its a little silly, but you are unfortunately a minority
no half of modern poland was in germany so it gets split between the two
huh ???
Like thee worst idea
3 Likes
yeah, germany gets all the polish warsaw pact vehicles and ussr gets all the nato polish vehicles /s
1 Like
Why are you trying to partition a nation
1 Like
As a twin seat airframe enjoyer, this is a win. F/A-18D is the highlight of the update for me :)
These next gaijin
Thanks
5 Likes
dont waste your time with him.
Says the ragebaiter lol
1 Like
what did i say ?
The camo suggests early 2000s looking at the tail. I think it’s based on this image of this image from 2004 specifically. It also already includes the refueling probe as easy indication that it’s post-1998.
However the radar these aircraft used is said to be N019ME from the start, which is the MiG-29SD radar. So I think it is fair to call the MiG-29N a 9.12 even from 1995, but it simply didn’t have the full capability yet that was ordered because a part would only be added after the delivery. Still, Malaysia never got these aircraft as basic 9.12 models.
I’m not saying it should use them, even if the radar could. There is other aircraft which have radar that could be used with ARH missiles such as the AN/APG-66(V)1 on the Thai F-16 OCU, but it is known it still can’t use them.
For the MiG-29N I think it is similar, since R-77 integration is mainly mentioned with proposed upgrade to N019M Topaz radar that likely didn’t happen, and with the proposed MiG-29NM modernization that never went beyond the proposal. This might be a misconception because later MiG-29SD of other nations used R-77.
2 Likes
A classic Russian moment.I’ve grown used to it.
Saying Poland and Ukraine should be with Russia, that’s called heresy !
give Poland to germany, not in a “haha funi ww2” sense but they genuinly are close allies