Again, six Brim 2s won’t destroy the game.
eighteen definitely would, but six won’t.
TBF the us probably only have stationary launchers. Supposedly used around Washington
Right. All but complete non answer.
again.
DO you know what the difference between brimstone 1 and 2 even is?
Why should it get limited number?
Supposedly Kurganets-25 is in the plans
He also said something about the T-15 Armata.
😄
This update is all well and good, with some cool additions. But we really need to see more de-compression. Alot of the 13.3 - 14.0 fighters struggle against the 14.3s, and now youre adding even better versions at the same BR.
Smin one of you compatriots have said this on a bug report
would you be able to back up what they said with their exact wording?
3 Likes
I think he means 6x FnF Brimstone 2s which would be one way of doing it.
Not limitng the number of SAL Brimstone 2s
Do we have any information on why the HQ-11 is missing its CIWS component? And if you wanted to give us exclusively missile access for whatever reason, why not give us the FM-3000 air defense system, which comes with 2x 8 FM-3000 batteries, making it functionally identical to the other multi-vehicle SAMs in the game? You basically gave China the worst top tier SPAA, again. HALF the missile loadout AND missing an important component of the weapons system for no reason.
1 Like
rule for you not for me kinda thing
1 Like
give grippen brimstone NOWWWW xD
This was the case with the F4F and AIM9-Juliets back in the day and F104G’s
the way he said it didnt make it clear
So what got pinned?
Technical compatability has always been the requirement for consideration.
Is Taiwan not part of china tech tree or so thing now? Why will it not get its mbt?
The Thread itself.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like