Shouldn’t it be the other way around if the f15 was one of the first AESA equipped jets ever, maybe I’m wrong on that, either way that does make sense mainly curious cause I haven’t seen any discussion regarding scan rate or scale for any US AESA while I’ve seen a ton for the EFT, su30SM2 and Rafale.
Don’t forget when the 120C-5version first appeared on the Dev Server the120 C-5performed quite well but it was nerfed later on
I like this version of the 120C-5

“Not in service”
And where is Strikeshield?
Would you like a violin solo to go with this

This is the trials vehicle, not the configuration that was accepted into service.
He is talking about strike shield
The planed APS for it is Iron fist IRL when ever that happens
Both photos are the trials vehicle actually. Even the in-service Block 1s had a different equipment fit
That’s block 2 still a little while away
I’m goated
Welp, Aussie Boxer is looking more and more likely to be the winter event reward. Guess I’m doing the winter event for it.
Lets hope we get a BR increase for these new wide aspect radars…
LEGION IRST pods are compatible with current F-16’s so it should be able to get it if we see both the PoBIT and the pod itself come. Also could come on the current F-16C, F-15C’s, and the F-15E.
nice thanks

I’m having quite a lot of fun making these stupid little things
@Smin1080p_WT Sorry to bother you, but is there any chance we will see 14.7 for air during this dev server/ before it hits live? I don’t see why planes like su30sm which are the same thing as the su30sm2 but with a much worse radar and engines should be the same br. Another example is the AESA eurofighters, they’re much stronger than the older ones in the TT.
I would have to expect so, no way they did .6 BR increase for the F-15C GE over the C with the exact same upgrade the EFT and su30SM2 just got without at least seeing a .3 change
I sure hope so, or the compression has reached new levels of f*cked.
didn’t know F4E had APG-65 and AMRAAMs