This is true. Non the less it will be a significantly and needed upgread for the swedish tt
Is the iris-t in the room with us?
is there proof of which AESA radar that Italy is buying?
If they were to make the Gripen E an 80 euro premium (hypothetically speaking, I know about the whole “no top BR premium stuff”), would you also count that as an AESA plane for the Swedish tree?
Cool shots
but i have a few questions; how did you manager to put all those aircrafts on the carrier, Was It a custom match?
Also i’d be interested in knowing how did you managed to take shots of the pilot from inside the cockpit, since i still haven’t figured It out yet
Gripen e has lower wing loading= better. Also the thrust increase far outweighs the weight increase.
How is its wing loading lower lol
Rb 98
You have hands, google
There involved in the ECRS Mk.2 development, so I’d just assume they’re going with that one until there’s proof to the contrary. Tho I don’t keep up with Italian EFT news or Mk.2 in general, my knowledge of it comes from what’s discussed here, so others like Flame or Gunjob probably know more about it.
I mainly pay attention to the german EFT & associated development.
That doesn’t answer their question though.
Well technically but then again no so i see what you mean
Calculate it with me!
Gripen c wing loading is 230 kg/m2, while gripen e is 250 kg/m2.
So now tell me how gripen e wing loading lower than gripen c lol
Larger wing area and larger control surfaces = lower wing loading. I dont know Where that homemade spreadsheet is from.
Dude. Do you know how wing loading is calculated lol.
Here’s source:

you know that the wingloading is the weight of the plane divided by the area of the wing
Yeah I set up a custom mission and set them up as with their engines and AI turned off so they were just static objects.
I just used freecam and moved the camera just behind the HUD. For the upside down pic I used the roll keybinds to get the orientation to match properly.
Exactly.
That’s why AMRAAM + Sidewinder aircraft are so underwhelming.
The meta is 50G and thrust-vectored missiles… not missiles that “have an advantage in 300km range launches”.

