(missiles they already said they wont be adding)
@Smin1080p_WT is there any particular reason why the M10 Booker is coming after the M3A3 Bradley instead of the Stryker MGS? By all logic the M10 should go after the Stryker as IRL they are intended for the same purpose, with the M10 even going so far as replacing the Stryker even if that was short lived. The Stryker ingame is also the last vehicle in its line and only one of its line at rank VII. It makes little sense to stick it after the M3A3 bradley as there are already 2 vehicles in its line at rank VII. I hope this is something that is rectified before the update launches
The SM2s that were delivered include some little upgrades (longer radar range, more cms, new missiles). And in the future, batches will be delivered with 117S, according to the chief designer
Now, the question is, we accept engines without photos and a couple of articles. But we don’t accept MRML racks with photos and procurement documents. It’s interesting.
“Information were added to an existing report.”
For WT, it doesn’t seem so; however, as of my last check, his website has been updated.
1 Like
I agree, but I’d also add this is less of an issue of the concept and more of Gaijins terrible implementation.
Subtrees could be a great way to introduce entire techtrees that otherwise might not be able to hold their own against nations like the US or USSR, but instead we get the gaming equivalent of using a friends hand as a makeshift band-aid
2 Likes
Okay, let’s say so. Can I ask you about the MRML situation?
I am not involved into the Development, i.e. → I’ve no clue, but I am sure answers were already given.
1 Like
Okay, thanks
UPD: The answer was vague. “The developers have no idea how it works or where the wires come from.”
wouldnt the al41 also come with yaw thrust vectoring
The last info Smin gave on it is that the devs are considering it.
1 Like
It seems odd that another version of the MB-326 is appearing so soon, usually it takes more than a year ( if ever ) for variants of user-made vehicles to come to the game.
I wonder if this could be taken to mean the SAAF MB-326K might come sooner rather than later ?
4 Likes
are You surprised? it was so obvious we’re getting a non-existant Frankenstein instead of Su-35s.
One more prediction - as su-35s will appear in the game, all reports related to the performance (IAS limit etc double racks etc) of su-30sm\sm2 will be instantly accepted.
Never happen before :D
My report for it actually got accepted last night
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QVi7eBtQsBHd
1 Like
" Will be fixed in the next major update" 🤣
1 Like
Tbf it was Japans only other option
I still have hopium this comes along, would be funi with the ground attack ATGMs too. Though I suspect heavily gaijin are holding it back to make it an event vehicle.
(and yeah, kinda odd not to be here given how quick they were for a hawk 209)
2 Likes