I don’t disagree but they will need to come because airframes will need them.
Typhoon with Meteor and ASRAAM is pretty average.
Any reason the Finnish MLU 2 isnt foldered with the F-18C while being the same BR, one is literally a worse in nearly every way. Why do we need another 400k rp sink for the 4th time?
Same, but as of right now, I’m just happy we get something besides the HQ-17
Right, so Israel gets one new item. At least it isn’t locked behind a pay wall this time, and something they needed.
Apparently if you lock a tank using the radar you can send an asm-2 its way, DEFYN killed a bradley somehow with it.
If only Israel had sketched a battleship they could have had it added
Haven’t you heard? This game just genuinely doesn’t like Sweden.
Did you mean to say ‘without’ here?
1 Like
Yes of course
1 Like
wait i thought asm-1 was radar but asm-2 was ir?
We will have to see if Gaijin is modelling IIR, otherwise there is no need to “test” these missiles, especially not in form of ground launched variants.
Amazing, I would expect no less haha
Ground is great most of the time, air is the forgotten nation lmao, what a joke
Knowing how much energy these will have is very important for launch ranges, and knowing maneuverability is still nice.
Thank god, My eye twitched reading ASRAAM and meteor being described as average lmao
2 Likes
Yeah I appreciate the Spyder’s addition, something was needed after the Chaparral for several updates now. I just wish we could get some fun things that we don’t necessarily need, along with the things we do need.
Yeah, and despite the fact the PL-12s preform on par with AIM 120Cs, the PL-12s are not getting a buff. American bias at its finest. Why doesn’t Britain, Germany, and Italy get Meteors? Oh wait, then America won’t be the most OP nation, like it has been since… well, forever.
1 Like
If only we could launch Kormorans at tanks
1 Like
Can you not set a point on the ground and launch it that way?
Sure, but they can (and likely do) test that without adding ground launched variants