come to think of it. if theyre going to give the f15e the 120c, why not give the 27sm and 29smt the r77-1. neither of these two used the base r77 to begin with
not really, HQ-17’s effective range is just about 9km, while the new ones have about 10
No, no, no, the HQ17 missile has a better storage capacity than the FB10a now, because the FB10 missile body is too light, and the actual effective range is only 6-8km
1 Like
FB-10A’s engine keeps push it until about 10km, HQ-17 about 9km
But after 10km, the missile has no energy, and now the test suit cannot launch FB10A, and when I go to the LSSUES area, I also say that I have not joined FB10A
relatable
Yep
Subtrees are a good concept, but they also have significant drawbacks for all involved nations the way they’re currently done. The idea is to fix those, not to take away the ability for nations to support eachother completely.
I’d also say this will help future new factions, which in many cases will include more nations. Take for example the leaked plans for a “Polish tree with eastern european subtree”, which would also include more nations by design.
But rather than tacking the other nations onto a Polish tree, with some limited to premium only once space runs low, I’d prefer all to have all of them get proper space in their own research tabs.
This would also allow, for example, Czech players to decide to play their nation, rather than being stuck playing poland to get a handful of the vehicles they really want.
I’m generally rather open with that. I’ve argued for and against various subtrees before and worked on subtree suggestions. So when I “don’t want X-Nation to have Y-Nation over Z-Reason”, you’ll know.
This has nothing to do with specific nations. It’s a system that helps all nation find better representation in game, subtree or not.
In case you took this as a hit against the Swiss subtree, not at all. Instead this can help bring more Swiss vehicle into a researchable form, that can be used with your German lineups, while also freeing up more space for German content.
Think of it as a way to expand the tree with more space per nation, since that is one of the main ideas behind it.
4 Likes
One upside of having Switzerland in Germany (although I’d rather it be independent) is that this beauty can actually be part of a loadout
While it’s difficult to fit in for now, with subtree folders, this could easily be slotted in a Swiss tab.
2 Likes
Seems like they’re not planning to folder new finnish f18 with the first one, this is so dissapointing
They’ll do it in like 3-4 major updates when everyone has already got it :) like the J-11 and J-11A
1 Like
No need for the derby er if they just fix the derby and the python 5 which is somehow has more range then the derby
3 Likes
Will there be a second test?
Any news? Would be dev server reopened?
Too many things still not fixed
Curious that the Japanese navy premium battleship is going to be
Dev server has only just closed.
If there were to be a second opening, we would announce it in the news.
In the mealtime, the developers are continually working on the update.
15 Likes
Do you know if there is any chance that we could see an article/statement from the devs about the new top tier spaa not being able to counter the truely problematic cas aircraft at top tier (on the dev)?
4 Likes
Given how the C-3604 was in the updated change log but not on the dev I think a second is most likely
It is very likely that the cm502 comparing Z10ME has not yet come out
I’m way more interested in the C-3604 than any Chinese additions atm
All of the new vehicles are still being worked on. So there isn’t current much to make a statement about.
4 Likes