You could also say it like it is.
We removed the MAWS and LWS from the Z-10 to make the Z-10A seem like a valid upgrade and make it more enticing for players to outright purchase with GE
You could also say it like it is.
We removed the MAWS and LWS from the Z-10 to make the Z-10A seem like a valid upgrade and make it more enticing for players to outright purchase with GE
Western bombs have already been provided. Sadly so far there isnt any evidence of specifically what “NATO compatable” / Western Weapons could be used on Sniper.
As we have already mentioned reports are more than welcome to be submitted for consideration with any souces that define what weaponry.
Can we please get fix for the NOT WORKING hmd acm locks
thanks mwah
For the same reason the B-29 is at lower ranks and the Canberra at mid ranks. There are currently two options of nuclear carriers per bracker range shared between nations.
Technically it’s a French…Jaaaaaaag
@Smin1080p_WT anything on the Tiger UHT getting the same weapon loadouts as the HAC?
The reports have been done since years and the tiger Hac just gets introtuced with the stuff the tiger uht is supposed to have and the tiger uht ignored
Probably has a few paintings on “loan” in the boot
but i think it would be much better if you give each nation its own nuke plane, for nations like japan and other nations like that, yes you cvan give them their own nuke. but usa always had its own nuke plane, russia too.
Yes, I know, I’m French
I can’t wait for this vehicle to be added but I have doubts, it’s still too early maybe, next year I hope
Hey good evening smin, I have two questions:
Hopefully Gaijin will add them.
What’s the premium: tech tree ratio looking like this update?
Or just add the option to switch between them
The Army doesn’t even have nukes (they used to have nuclear guns and stuff like Pershing II missiles and MGM-52)
If it wasn’t for cold war ending, MGM-140 ATACMS would have a nuclear warhead available
Isn’t it a bit too weak in terms of the performance of China’s CS/SA5 in the current test server, even in the face of helicopters, it cannot be effectively suppressed?
The wording here’s a bit weird.
Should probably specify that only maneuverability is far from being inferior to the F-16.
This was also very disappointing to read. With IOG/IIR the ASM-2 shouldn’t have much issues hitting ground targets, especially considering the practice targets for it are smaller than tank sized.