That was just the radar altitude coverage btw, nothing about intended missile performance.
1 Like
they have made 3d model of the tu-95 and used it, it has no details in it, but they made it, for 3d designers its not hard to make such a model in a few hours
They bought a low quality model for the video. That’s it.
1 Like
Got this from the autotranslation from the russian stream. So yeah the max range will likely still be 40km, but they are basically saying that outside of 15-20km you can just turn around and easily outrun the missile. So the max effective range will be within that 15-20km range.
So you were still somewhat right.
Spoiler
So far, Soyuz ingame has:
-Best armor both in terms of thickness and array.
-Best AP shell, with highest amount of TNT equivalent (60% more explosive than Yamato’s 460mm shells) and Iowa’s penetration.
-Fastest firing 406mm guns; 28.5 second reload.
-Small and low positioned ammo racks.
In short, it is and will be the best Battleship ingame, surpassing Iowa, Yamato, and every other.
It’s funny how the most legendary ships actually ever built are going to be, once again, overshadowed by something that, although had its construction begun, could never have been finished to match the ingame’s specifications.
As you know, I have ZERO issue at all with unfinished projects making it to the game; I believe they are cool and necessary… but they should be implemented in a grounded and realistic manner.
I feel like an idiot having grinded the 3 best Naval nations in WW2, seeing as how the ONE nation that barely had a Navy in real life is going to surpass them all ingame.
Well, let’s be optimistic; in the future, these nations will still be better than Russia once they get more of their ships leading to stronger all-around lineups, even if Soyuz remains the best.
16 Likes
Kronshadt and Soyuz share the same fantasy ammunition that couldn’t have been built by either the US or Japan, let alone Russia…freaking space magic railguns
11 Likes
None of them are in the British TT, now this is just insulting, CF-188 skin not on a CF-188
4 Likes
Just un ER the derby on them like how asters are un 30ed in current scenario
But does it look the same as the Israeli spyder? Nahhh
Netherlands F5 now available on preorder ;-)
Now that is great news :D
When I saw the stats and layout for the ship, I knew something was extremely fishy. It’s really convenient to add an unfinished project, because then stats can just be made up, and what proof do people have against said stats? Reminds me of a certain missile in the game.
Even if it does end up like that, sources confirming a direct hit on an evading target at 30km distance and 12km altitude have already been found.
8 Likes
I think this could make much more sense.
we put the swiss tree in the third line, the 4th line will be for West/United germany ground attackers and the 5th line ends with East Germany Strike aicraft
Also the C-3604 could be shoved in the 3th line aswell before? the BF110 C7 so all swiss aicrafts could be in the same line.
@Deathmisser your opinion on that since you really like to remake the Trees aswell :)
5 Likes
does not mention that its a super sonic target , a subsonic drone maneuvering =/= a super sonic fighter jet.
Ok, here are a few other things to note.
It opens with Leo Major, known for liberating a Dutch town by himself from the Germans during WW2.
The firing of a missile at the ship for the Hornet is more likely a reference from when CF-188 plots tried to use an AIM-7 to sink one.
The new NF-5 skin makes sense—well, not the exact model. It is our newest Canadair aircraft, further modified from the CF-116.
2 Likes
These 3?
1 Like
Well that’s it cooked then Britain are never getting a Canadian CF-188
RAAF f18s when?
1 Like
The last hope RAAF F/A-18 with ASRAAM
1 Like