@Smin1080p_WT Since on the updated dev notes would the C-3604 be a pre-order or a standard pack released after the update ?
it looks cool
Yeah…
Stay tuned to the news next week. More info to come.
I hope so even though I highly disagree with it being a premium, I’m still gonna get it lol
Anything on the IRIS-T SLM missile speed reports?
As its the weekend, there will generally be little news to provide on report updates I’m afraid.
The time to target’s report remains open: Community Bug Reporting System
1 Like
Hey, Smin.
About the MTB-460 that’s coming. Last I’d seen it had the British as operator; however, as far as I can find(from asking around and looking up), it only had Canadian crew and served the RCN. Are there plans to change the operator nation before it hits live?
Hey.
As far as im aware we have no reports on this or internal suggestions, so a report would be welcome with any evidence to clarify that. We can pass it for review for consideration then.
3 Likes
Thx for your reply earlier, speaking of reports, are there reports on the Su-25TM (Su-39) missing air to ground weaponry? there are pictures showing the aircraft having access to more weaponry on some wing pylons, it is currently missing options for two Kh-29T/TE’s and two 8 Vikhr ATGM pylons.
Due to the aircraft’s nature primary and secondary sources are difficult to come by.
1 Like
There are suggestions for KAB-500L, Kh-25MTP, R-27R/ER/R-77 and increased numbers of Kh-25, R-60 and R-73. But I cant find any suggestion reports for the Kh-29 family or additional Vikhirs.
that reminds me, are there any news on the R-27R/ER for the Su-39? the thing even flew with them and it is a real shame it isn’t able to take them in game as it severely hampers it’s ability to defend itself in air rb
5 Likes
For the time being, its not something planned for the aircraft anytime soon.
Thx for your answers, i’ll go report the missing armaments, have a great one!
3 Likes
Just give up on it. Su-39 is not fun to play and it isn’t going to be given things that make it more fun.
It’s just going to sit there with the basically pointless radar. Anyone who disagrees should be sentenced to using the tws gtmi mode for 300 matches.
I was so excited about it coming to the game, but now I just accept that it’s over and will never get better.
It will all be rejected because BR reasons.
Since Gaijin has already modeled the Humvee, what’s stopping them from adding the Avenger as well?
As a Japanese main who loves the Type 93, I would be happy for the US mains if they had such a fun vehicle as well.
3 Likes
are there reports on the Su-25TM (Su-39)
I know I’ve dragged this out for more than a year but the SU-39 and SU-25TM are slightly different aircraft in which one evolved from the other, the SU-39 unlike the SU-25TM was upgraded with the SUO-39P fire control system for better integration of A2A missiles like the RVV-AEs and R-271s.
Documents of this has been posted by me multiple times on the SU-39 topic
They’re like the same aircraft but different, best to refer to them just as the SU-39 or SU-25TM separately when relevant and not SU-25TM (SU-39).
Speak for yourself, this thing would be totally fun with these armaments, especially sim.
1 Like
i’d trade an 11.7 br for 12.0 if it means i get two R-27R/ER’s and 4 R-73’s
2x R-27Rs wouldnt have much of an impact on BR
2x R-27ERs would have to be 12.0 at a bare minimum, and even that might be too low.
4x R-73s would probably be okay at 11.7 but 4x R-73s + 2x R-27Rs and that starts to push maybe needing to be 12.0+ and 4x R-73 + 2x R-27ER would easily be 12.3+
1 Like