Yeah, which is why the idea was to suggest it alongside a BR increase to 14.0 for the J(M), which is already among the strongest 13.7 aircraft.
But I understand if there’s nothing that can be done…
Yeah, which is why the idea was to suggest it alongside a BR increase to 14.0 for the J(M), which is already among the strongest 13.7 aircraft.
But I understand if there’s nothing that can be done…
I’m going crazy staring at the gap between the F-104A/C and F-5E. The lack of Dart is killing me.
Hey smin is there any intention of buffing the AAM-4 or the other missiles which were artifically nerfed to meet the performance of the AMRAAM A/Bs?
Can we expect the pre order this week?
Also uhhh, hi there i’m the writer of that report. And i just wanna say that uhh, no, the F-2 does not use AoA manuevering IRL. It uses a G-maneuvering system, the AoA system is solely for the deployment of flaperons/leading edges.
Kiyoshi MATSUMIYA, Kuniichi KANDA, Masahiro YASUE, Masami KAGEYAMA, Development of the XF-2, Aeronautical
and Space Sciences Japan, 1998, Volume 46, Issue 536, Pages 476-484, Released on J-STAGE December 16, 2010,
Online ISSN 2424-1369, Print ISSN 0021-4663, XF-2の開発,
i tried the same with the Gripens. dosnt seem he even wanna send it to the devs for concideration.
Hey. Its not been claimed the F-2 uses AoA manoeuvring IRL. I was referring to the feature as it is in game. Not the induvial systems each particular aircraft uses.
Ahh i see, my bad.
Because it has already been considered and the answer has been provided by the devs that its currently just for the 14.0s. We cannot pass something that has already been considered.
@Smin1080p_WT Hi, I’m taking advantage of the fact that you’re talking about the Phimat, in the server dev the Mirage F1s received the Phimat but only on its starboard side but irl it can also use it on the port side (it is possible to carry two pods simultaneously). I’ve made several bug reports but none have been noticed so far, would it be possible to foward it ?
[DEV SERVER] Mirage F1 (all variants) missing Phimat Pod (V3) // Gaijin.net // Issues
So the F-15J(M) was already considered to receive AIM-120C-5?
Because it’s somewhat obscure information that Japan even had the C-5 it seems like something the devs might not have thought of but would be interested to consider with the current lack of 14.0 for Japan.
can also just… you know… fix the AAM-4
Would be nice, but also not quite the same.
Fixed AAM-4 would have similar range still, but lower seeker range (15km vs 16km now), lower G load (25G vs 32G now), with the main improvements being the improved datalink and frequency modulation. It can also still only be carried on the fuselage, which would mean the average ARB lineup still uses 2 AMRAAMs.
So personally I’d like to see both. Shouldn’t be an issue at 14.0 anyways
The bottom one is Israeli last I checked, I don’t believe it derives from an American made system.
Correction, it is an Israeli variant, but the US Army did test this variant, maybe even used it. It might even be a similar or the same system as shown above. However it wasn’t created by the US, but rather for them, and the Israelis ended up using them it seems.
Shenav has let me down countless times, will not grind
Hi smin. What are the news of restoring 100% capabilities of the PL-12s?
what if we just go back to aim 9b and r3
chatgpt response:
The MiG-29 Sniper, the unique Romanian-Israeli upgrade of the MiG-29, was enhanced to carry a more advanced and versatile weapons loadout compared to the original MiG-29. Here’s a rundown of the types of weapons it could carry:
Im not sure spesifically what you mean by this, but as with all matters of this kind, if you have valid public sources that show something is incorrect, you can report it here: Community Bug Reporting System
Ai detected, opinion rejected