What inherently is wrong with the air frame as u mentioned before. I know about the radar.
There is no maybe, the F/A-18C was mediocre at BVR. There is really 0 problem with that thing getting the C-5. F-15 is a lot more conflicting though.
And only 1 Hornet is getting the BOL launchers. Also you guys were always the one saying BOL was mediocre anyway.
Please use English here
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
If thats the case, any idea why gaijin decided to buff the MICA again with update 2.46.0.16?
It really depends on the seeker imo. if its the same seeker as the B, then yes, if its a lot harder to defeat both kinematically and with notch/chaff then it could be a major issue as it has 10.
So far*
We have no idea if its planned for the rest but just not ready.
Yes and no. Yes it is, when you only have 2, like on the Viggen, Tornado or even Typhoon. 4 is a little better on the Gripen or Harrier, because you can spam even more, but 8? Is kinda insane.
Also
This
If BOL actually get fixed? Then it becomes quite a major deal and I am also concerned that F-18s gettng 8x BOL will mean the aircraft with 2 will have to suffer because they dont want to deal with balancing the F-18
1 Like
So looks like the Yukikaze was the only thing added glad to know a ship is almost a gb in size lol
3 Likes
Oooooh… that explains it, hahah.
I can stop looking for stuff for now, then!
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Sorry to ping you and ask a question like this, seeing as the Swiss F-5E has the Sergeant Fletcher 275 gallon drop tanks, is it in the dev’s plans to either add them to the other F-5Es and F-20, or at least replace their 150 gallon drop tanks with them (since it’d be more accurate)?
2 Likes
It’s still launched from a Hornet, which usually launch from lower altitude and with less speed (for obvious reasons), which makes that it’s missiles have less energy and are easier to kinematically defeat to begin with.
1 Like
Which is fine for say F-18 vs F-15 or Typhoon with AIm-120B.
But F-18 vs J-11? Gripen C? Etc etc does change the equation a bit. Because AIm-120C5s on the F-18 fired at the same alt as say a Gripen with Aim-120B? Is probably not far off in terms of energy, but the the C5s pull more Gs and the Gripen might find itself defending against 10. Especially the F-18 might be able to do an Su-30 and just shoot down incoming AMRAAMs in a pinch
1 Like
I would buy it if they would fix this hole thing,
Stealth is not working like with the F-117, and I know that the RAH-66 is not completly invisible but it doesn’t even work on range like it should, Every SAM with a Radar ingame can see that Thing even at 20km though trees.
It also misses weapons, like the AGM-114K, since the 114B wasn’t even in prodction anymore at the time the Progamm was at its peak, from the article Stingers and Hydras are confirmed as well as the better T800 engines, but also where is the RWR and Flares/Chaff, which it also had. Of couse now after the new SAMs they could give give the RAH-66 as well as the other 3 Top Tier Helis the AGM-114L, since it won’t be that OP, from what they say the Kh-38MT is also not OP so why not.
1 Like
True but that is also why those planes are 13.7 instead of 14.0. As it currently is the Hornet falls in between 2 BRs. It’s too bad to really be 14.0 but it’s also too good to be 13.7.
Gaijin’s options were either to move the Su-30SM, F-15E/I, EFT and Rafale to 14.3 and leave the F/A-18C at 14.0, or give the F/A-18C better capabilities and keep it at the same BR as the others. It’s clear now which option they have in mind.
Because it will change nothing overall, it’s not like it will help doing much kill, it’s a waste of energy for the mica in most situation.
Cant give it Hellfire Longbows as a pack premium as it would then be a top tier premium instead of a high tier one, thus by Gaijins own rules cant be a pack vehicle
This problem could’ve been avoided altogether if Gaijin added J-10B and Gripen NG this update, but Gaijin says no I guess.
Hornet can get its 120C-5s, and all nations can be competitive at top tier.
But Gaijin decides to give F-15E 120C-5 for some reason as well.
3 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/qy7QC0ktkSqH
new weapon suggestion up. about the Swedish JAS 39 Gripen armaments. if you got any more sources to add please do.
hmmm I wonder if we will see the JAS39C in the UK tree go down in BR as its only got the R-Darters that were already a lot worse then AIM-120As never mind C-5s
Not really an impactful buff tbh
Like, sure, you can lauch the missile on a target that is 90° off of you, but you’ll have 0 range and the missile will be incredibly easy to chaff