i found a report on A3, nominal range means a conservative estimate right?
and are RFI’s classified or all clear to post?
That will be the instrumented range, so the max one
dunno
yeah, cross checked with 2 other things and they all say 75km (pretty sure its for A3 version). what version of Sentinel was the first brochure screenshot for?
First is named just standard Sentinel, and it is from before the second one, that is for ISentinel (the first brochure is older than the second one). It seems to be to the standard sentinel.
1 Like
Potentially, though I’d rather those only come if they belong to a nation that wouldn’t fit as a sub tree or sub nation (I.E. Mexican F-5E, Tunisian F-5E, etc). I feel like American Tiger IIs (Tiger IV, F-5N, F-5F, etc) should be the primary options, with ones from other nations coming secondary.
this is quite confusing, there is 120km range from army recognition for F1 and also from kongsberg
but US govt RFI for the A4 (SAM.gov) and air defence manual (https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/fm3_01.pdf) say 75km for the A3. maybe the US ones are lowballing the range a bit since A3 is newer than F1 and should be better afaik.
this even says A3 and F1 are same thing and talks about 120km range (and how it tripled from original 40km)
Event vehicle would make sense as well. Regarding it being “boring”: yes and no. To most, it would 100% ve seen as “just another F-5”. For those interested in the F-5 family however, the F-5N is a very interesting part of its history, with them still being used to this day in the adversary role. (with some private firms even having their own fleets)
Fair point, I forgor :skull:
Can I get too 😇
4 Likes
won’t escape my f104’s 9B no more
1 Like
flares are not needed to escape 9b anyway.
9b will force the yak28 into evasive maneuvers which make it bleed speed thus letting the f104 catch it faster
thats correct.
Hey, sorry for ping @Smin1080p_WT but i am curious there is a plan to add longbows on apaches? Because right now there is a lot of Heli’s with FnF or SACLOS and Apaches should get those missiles to be more competitive on top tier.
New batch of suggestions just passed, this is what I’m most excited for
Oddly enough, the Shinano got passed in it’s BB configuration, not in it’s CV form.
Edit: Two more unfinished ships have hit the passed list 🫠
2 Likes
Sk 60F is nice but if added would be the most difficult aircraft to play lmao, a trashy 8.3 trainer at 9.3 lmao its amazing people let Saab 105’s kill them at 8.3 but at 9.3 it would take some serious skill issue to die to one also the ELC for france looks pretty neat and a fine addition to the collection.
Hey @Morvran, did you see already that the Handley Page O/400 (HP.12) got buffed with its loadouts XD
5 Likes
X band would be the one fielded by Norwegian Army. Used on the HML and the NOMAD
The NASAMS 2 used the Improved Sentinel radar, perhaps thats what was made to use for the SLAMRAAM
@Smin1080p_WT
I really like these premium bundles of three vehicles!
This well reduce the incentive to leave after 1 death with a premium vehicle!
So i have a question:
“Are there plans to add this to every single nation?”
“Are there any plans to bundle up some existing vehicles together?”
“Are there any plans to make bundels for higher battle ratings (e.g. 7.0-8.0-9.0-10.0)?”
“Are there any plans to do this for air and naval too?”
3 Likes
Interesting