Major Update "Leviathans" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Finland got screwed from having on par aircraft because gaijin wanted unique differences with the hornets so why is it a problem now? All im saying is BOL should be exclusive idc we got shafted before and this isnt any different

Yeah im tired from playing a gimped hornet, BOL wont make it a good 14.0 but its the best we have since Gripen NG isnt here, at least when i play the US i have actually good vehicles to choose from. The US tested with BOL, its not a consistent service item imo it shouldn’t get it.

4 Likes

aware of this, using at as counterpoint for BOL

1 Like

US operationally used BOL on F-14 and F-15. its in US stockpiles and was evaluated on hornets

if swiss hornets get a bunch of stuff they never had there should be 0 issue with US F/A-18C getting BOL it really did have, at least once or a couple times

4 Likes

And its for gaijin to decide if they get it or not, its their choice. Just like it was to make the EFT’s different and the same with the MLU 2. Why do you think they didn’t give the MLU 2 any of the other weapons the other hornets can use. If gaijin made them all equal sure but for now thats not the case.

1 Like

Though annoyingly they gave Italy and Germany Brimstones and PW4s, but didnt want to give Britain ePaveway II or GBU-48s…

gotta love that

Again gaijin chooses whats different similar with Pirate iirc

they can also make the US one unqiue by giving it the USN/USMC strike capabilities and USN BOL. wouldnt be OP so balance shouldnt be a problem.

Or they can make it unique by leaving it as is

and then the finnish one isnt uniqiue

2 Likes

That was what smin stated when the fins asked for HMD, even if it didn’t get CAS it simply removed the uniqueness from the US

if they reduced weight on Finnish hornet that would also make it unique.

phahahahaa

Thats for gaijin to decide and what makes it unique is for them to decide also

its true though accoridng to Pheonix

currently both the US and Finnish one are unique to one another

1 Like

Read his words on differences, again its up to the snail

Exactly, one has great CAS and A2A creating a well balanced multirole and the other lacks effective CAS but woth BOL making it better suited for A2A

no, it could be lighter + different strike capability. Finnish MLU 2 more suited for air bc reduced weight, American C late more suited for ground because of wider loadout

they could remain unique if they added BOL because of different weight and different a2g loads