It uses the ALR-67(V)3, so C-K band coverage, same as the US C late.
Was making a joke about terrible compression lol
Will try to report Vanguard and other 15" down, Rodney down, Selvastopol and Gneisenau up, 15" HE, Sovetsky armour->face hardened, I think thats my current list.
Oh and Vanguard needs radar FCS modelling
Okay thank you, now i need to see its weight on both the Finnish, swiss, and US hornets. Both Finland and Switzerland used Titanium Keels rather than the steel ones used by the US.
Are you sure this isn’t just a later serial thing?
Welcome back Frs.1 e
Its specifically noted for the Finnish when i requested info on the early F-18C’s built by Patria. All MLU’s have this including some 2 seaters which got their original Keels replaced sometime in 2008
I spaded the FRS.1(e) last month and I really hated it, so I completely expect the Gnat to be the exact same.
What could be… but alas, Britain must suffer
Lmao yes, but the harriers are not fair to judge based off war thunder as they have a terribly botched FM.
Among other issues*
It would be too scary for the other nations waa
Yeah… 100% max strength FRS1e could be a decent 11.0
At least the one saving grace for this major. Vanguard looks decently tanky, with ammo racks well and truly safe from direct fire. Only need to be worried about plunging fire
At least according to the datamines they’re all the same (empty) mass (MLU2 and both C lates), all 11340kg. With the Swiss C late using the same FM file as the US C late.
Very true
The MiG-21 players face when the harrier actually turns will be priceless.
Would effectively make flying low near instant death for any other plane.
Interesting. Maybe US one can get better loadouts if the Swiss/Sweden ones are lighter
The only people that favour plunging fire is us, Japan to a lower extent, and really Japan just needs to pray their reload also doesn’t get nuked…
Everyone else is using muzzle velocity to get higher pen.
So we should be okay… ish… in uptiers, so long as we dont get screwed offensively