You are also assuming Gaijin will put effort into making a good fm for it…
Finnish tax, you can be 10.0 and ours just wont have any guns on it for historical reasons despite having them irl
Don’t remind me of the time when the Hunter F.6 could see the F-14
Haha, to be fair. I cant think of a single aircraft that got BOL that werent a messy introduction.
What a timeline to live in
Gnat? 10.3 and has the turning radius of New Caledonia take it or leave it.
Watch as this post gets maybe 6 votes lol, you posted it in the US F18 chat and it will be ignored lol, now in this forum it might get 1 more person
At this point every UK vehicle might as well be 14.0
(Or 15.0 if it’s just UK Vs UK)
Gnat are annoying bugs so because of name add another BR to it
Hey can you tell me what RWR the MLU 2 has? If its matches the F-18C and not the US late its wrong. It should have a new RWR thanks to Patria
So, Gneisenau should have a 60+ second reload and has 30 seconds without expert or ace.
So that thing is gunna be OP as hell. But god forbid Vanguard having 25 second reload or Rodney 30 seconds
It would likely be 9.3 with the Ariete. It does everything better but wing loading, so probably a worse STR.
It uses the ALR-67(V)3, so C-K band coverage, same as the US C late.
Was making a joke about terrible compression lol
Will try to report Vanguard and other 15" down, Rodney down, Selvastopol and Gneisenau up, 15" HE, Sovetsky armour->face hardened, I think thats my current list.
Oh and Vanguard needs radar FCS modelling
Okay thank you, now i need to see its weight on both the Finnish, swiss, and US hornets. Both Finland and Switzerland used Titanium Keels rather than the steel ones used by the US.
Are you sure this isn’t just a later serial thing?
Welcome back Frs.1 e
Its specifically noted for the Finnish when i requested info on the early F-18C’s built by Patria. All MLU’s have this including some 2 seaters which got their original Keels replaced sometime in 2008