The absurd amount of countermeasures really makes me want to grind it. It looks so goofy and fun even if bol launchers are not super good.
Yeah I know but it is an American system and used by US
BOL is also used by USN (or was, idk) so no reason to not have it
1 Like
They better move it up to 14.7 then, like how the hell are planes at 13.0 supposed to fight? Oh yeah, surely the F-4 will surely stand a chance, especially since the German F-4 does nothing but see F-15s
Do Marines use it?
Dunno about the marines, but the F/A-18C ingame is a navy one, isn’t it?
No reason why not use the reason they denied things for the Finnish Hornet. Its too similar to the US so we created artificial differences.
So now the US would be too similar to the Finnish Hornet.
C late is USMC I think, but should be interchangeable with Navy hornets weaponry and systems
The US doesn’t use ATFLIR
Just looked it up, the Marine Corps does use the ATFLIR. However Gaijin seems to be against the US getting ATFLIR.
Really dang, i thought they used a newer pod then ATFLIR
On the Super Hornet perhaps, but apparently not on the F/A-18C/Ds
Bruh why they hid you saying 1st
So kinda super disappointed with how much premiums are coming this update. Cool update but a lot of the stuff besides the SPAA and F-2 don’t really affect me. NEVERMIND C5 added whoop
Personally, gajin not ready MBDA Meteor for Typhoon FGR.4, Gripen C (Swedish) and Rafale C until 2030
Wait 4 years or 5 years gajin add F-2000A and EF-2000 Tranche 3A with Meteor
Not forgot RTAF Gripen C armed AIM-120C-5 (instead AIM-120B)
Of course there a many premiums, they are adding 3 new triple premium packs.
Those packs are amazing btw, even tho I’m not very happy with their vehicle choices for the British one.
Gaijin has no plans to update the Gripen C’s which is why they dont use the Gripen C radar and use the A model/MS17
Gripen NG and E will probably be glorified MS20 and not MS21 models
Gripen NG has an AESA Radar so even if it’s copy and paste from the KFIR or Rafale it will be great
They do
But still, for the sake of argument if they didn’t,
ATFLIR can be mounted on C Hornet’s since it is currently mounted on the Swiss C Late Hornet, therefore since it can be mounted to a Hornet it is able to be considered and/or implemented.
1 Like
-
If anything it’s the Finns taking away from the US hornet, originator should always have priority unless it was not possible or there is alternative
-
USN testing in 1995 apparently, which is same year as Finland got it’s first hornet so USN probably put BOL on their hornets before Finland