What are you talking about?
I think. He had a ship at a specific rank (like Rank V) and now its moved to down to Rank IV and so now has research effeceincy negatives if used to research rank VI stuff
The only vehicles going down in rank are the M551 (tank) and the Phong Kong T-34 (SPAA) tho
Ahhh, aight, haven’t seen that yet
Wrong place to complain about that then lol
Yeah, probably, but I think he does actually have a valid point. If a vehicle moves rank, it should loose the talisman and instead you get a token that can be used on any vehicle of the original rank or below (So if it was a rank V ship and moved to rank IV. You should get a rank V token that you can be used on anything between Rank I to V)
Way too complicated, just refund the GE for the Talisman, like they do when modules get removed
Yeah, or that
Or just get rid of research effeciency entirely
Can’t get rid of research efficiency, as that would make premiums less appealing
Unfortunately that is true…
its danish not swedish nor finnish
1 Like
We’re getting a Danish M24 in the TT this update.
A US tank in Danish service.
So a Swedish plane in Danish service should be even more TT worthy.
It’s the Austrian Draken that should be added as a squadron plane.
Its just what they picked as a SQV.
Like Britain got the Sea Harrier Orignally as SQV and only came to the TT because how heavily people complained about it.
One of the most iconic and important British jets ever made, was added as an SQV… Was annoying.
So in this, it makes sense for it to be a “sub-TT” filling the SQV, but it could have just as easily been something Swedish. The point is, it was the right fit for the BR they wanted
1 Like
I’m just worried they’ll turn the Austrian one into a premium or event plane.
Unless Sweden could get two squadron Drakens (eventually), in which case I wouldn’t mind.
I just really want that stupid 35Ö with all aspect missiles (with IRCCM even), RWR and CMs, but I also don’t want to suffer through an air event.
is anyone else confused that they are saying that they are swapping the m551 and the Xm800 so that they are the exact same way that they are already in game?
No? The 800 is rank V atm and the 551 rank VI.
- M551 and XM800T have switched places and ranks. The XM800T’s rank has been changed from V to VI. The Scout UAV modification has been added.
- The M551’s rank has been changed from VI to V. The Scout UAV modification has been removed.
1 Like
huh, maybe my TT is bugged out so that its actually correct or something idk
Are you on the dev server maybe?
Still shook by that, it should have been a frs 51 as squadron vehicle instead!
1 Like
I’ve spent enough time buggering about in test flights to land tornados on carriers reliably, and even did it in SB a few times same with the F-111s
just pray to god you catch the wire cause you’ll struggle to recover if you do, despite me usually coming fast for a carrier landing. I tend to slam the elevator to help get the hook to catch the wire more reliably. which usually causes the plane to become very unstable if you miss and become airborne again. very much not textbook
it can be done if they’re going in circles but it amps the difficulty up a lot, and VTOLs are dead easy to land as long as you have an SAS mode active
worst parts about landing a plane on a carrier is that HMS Ark Royal has no AA, and I’ve been victim to R-24Ts and ambitious long range AIM-9G/L, and the Forrestal is always on the wrong team for me to use
2 Likes