1 Like
but they’re useful for F-2 i guess
yep
sounds Nice, and is also quieter than the old Fox sound too, while also being a lot less harsh
1 Like
Yes and none of the other CVRT issues where fixed but I’m so glad they sound different
1 Like
Why should we need to do bug reports to fix the AIM-120C5 when:
- The development team didn’t used any bug reports to do ahistorical nerfs to 120A/Bs, the community already did some bug reports with the 120A/B and they already admitted those nerfs on maneuverability were ahistorical by accepting the exact day 1 performance of Search & Destroy 120A/Bs metrics as a suggestion?
- The development team is currently considering the 120A/Bs performance to be practically the same as the C5s, while having different fins, avionics, drag and even motors?
You better have some compelling arguments to invite us to do bug reports, because right now, from a player’s perspective, we’re facing arbitrary decisions without any chance to dialogue.
5 Likes
New additions:
- C-3604 (Pack)
- T-34-85E — the model has been updated
-
UH-1C — detailed damage model has been added
-
UH-1D — detailed damage model has been added
-
AB 205 A-1 — detailed damage model has been added
- Kh-29 (all variants) — a limitation on allowed missile release speed of M1.5, which was erroneously missing, has been added.
Other
- A bug in the hit analysis menu that caused the positions of the gun and turret not to change when replaying a hit if the tank had a “Smoke grenade” modification installed has been fixed.
- A bug in the hit analysis menu that caused the shaped charge and fragments of HEAT shells and ATGMs as well as the fragments of APHE shells to not deal damage has been fixed.
- A bug in the hit analysis menu that could cause the majority of hits to not play has been fixed. (Report).
Removed from list (not relevant due to this topic)
- HMS Marlborough, HMS Iron Duke — Battle Rating in all modes has been increased from 6.7 to 7.0.
- USS Colorado, USS Tennessee, Scharnhorst, Kronstadt, HMS Warspite, HMS Rodney, HMS Hood, IJN Fuso, IJN Ise — Battle Rating in all modes has been increased from 7.0 to 7.3.
- IJN Amagi, Mutsu — Battle Rating in all modes has been increased from 7.0 to 7.7.
1 Like
Hi,
the squadron Hunter F.58 also recieved a new cockpit. It is not listed in the changelog yet.
how about giving the Tiger UHT the missing weapon loadouts u gave the french tiger HAC.
not like the german bug reports are open since years and the french just got it handed
3 Likes
Absolutely classic Gaijin.
→ Add a new subtree
→ Make it almost entirely C&P
→ Make basically the only actually unique addition as a premium
18 Likes
Will this be a pre-order ?
something i find ridiculous is that C-5 and 9X on the slamraam has the same max speed
they gave it different stat than the planes
they did this because of balance but no i dont think so
if they copy the plane AIM-120C-5 to the slamraam it would reach higher max speed than MIM-146, has more range, more manuverability and more impactful
same with 9X, copy 9M stats and adjust to match 9X level(g-pull, acceleration)
they made a whole new stat for it instead of just putting C-5 planes stat in
u can see it reach max speed in a short time but dropped down because “muh ground launch=no speed”, i would like to see what happen if they just put the planes C-5 stat on it, it would for sure has much better range and manuverability
2 Likes
3 Likes
WHY!? at this point just call the update wallet milker
12 Likes
Seriously please. Any major bug fixes in this update? The Brenus armor fix? The Centurion AVRE frontal armor fix? The Merkava armor fix? The Chinese tank spall liner fix? The damage model improvement? These are the ones I came up with without much thought, and they are already infinitely more important to fix than, “Type 5 Chi-Ri — the 37 mm gun barrel thickness has been reduced from 20mm to 10mm to match the thickness of other 37 mm guns.” or “T-64A (1971) — gun elevation speed has been increased from 3.3 to 3.5 degrees/s”.
6 Likes
Will be any Typhoon Radar bug fixes in the incoming update?
Or can i save my harddrive storage for something else?
1 Like
It’s gotten a slightly buggy GMTI mode that as of the last time I checked. Didn’t cue the tpod to the lock though, so a lot of potential value is lost.
Nothing for A2A
Ok, this is beginning to slightly concern me, given that the Dev Server is coming to an end…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2LpLh7pCx8iu
4 Likes
So many premiums, guess that’s where the development time for the British, Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Soviet/Russian and Swedish medium range SAMs went
5 Likes
i highly suspect that there is going to be a 2nd dev server
for example the saab f-35 dosent even have a texture currently
the mirage IIIS still has a placeholder radar