Isn’t Litening 3 already a counterpart to base SNIPER pod?
Will Gaijin adress the fact that they gave the Russians a (probably fake/not operational) Kh-38MT missile that is IR+IOG+GNSS guided, 40km range and 150kg TNTeq, but at the same time claim the Brimstone that has half the range and needs a direct hit would be too strong if it was fire and forget? xdd
4 Likes
Not really
Litening IV is
L4 is counterpart to SNIPER XR and L5 is to SNIPER ATP-SE
Hi @Smin1080p_WT I am curious if there is any word on more vehicles getting access to AIM-120C-5s besides the F/A-18C Lates, F-15E/I, and Eurofighters.
1 Like
what’s this?
the mt has nowhere near 40 km range. It’s like saying the AIM-120 has 80km, but it won’t reach that in normal gameplay.
new name
Update tomorrow
Same same, but different
Well so you would agree they never used them?
So why should US F-16s get a MAWS system they never equiped?
With the Sniper Pod coming to those aircrafts, could we get an update on the reports about the LJDAMs for all three of them?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0UjAnlhuviBz
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/l2qWZGFSfArm
1 Like
So… am I the only one kinda pissed that other planes don’t get the Turn’n’burn fuel dump like the F-111A? Some others had it in real life, for example the F-14
1 Like
Right, based on the above report it made out the US did not see the advantages in the adopting the system.
this is more recent i think
1 Like
This will invalidate major US mains copium about “fighting with 70s tech against modern Russian bias” so we can’t allow that.
It’s only one vehicle out of many at top tier so it would just not be as strong of an argument
True, US main will always find something to complain about. And no amount of MAW or CMs will save them because “flying into stratosphere, spamming all your AIM-120s and run home” is not an effective WT strategy.
So unfair when they had to use their 2006 f16 against a 2002 su27sm