Yes, before the second test, the US Blue Water VI had six ships, and unlocking VII required unlocking the entire VI ship. The developers then changed the unlocking condition for VII to five ships. However, due to changes in the Navy BR, Texas has now moved to V, but unlocking VII still requires five ships. If you already have Alaska, Nevada, Tennessee, Texas, Arizona, you could unlock iowa before the Navy BR change, but now you still need Colorado. Players still need to develop six ships, although the RP demand in Texas has decreased, the final result is only a small reduction in the total experience of developing six ships, which is about 200000 RP. This is a very “huge” load reduction XD
@Smin1080p_WT i have one question the I-Derby ER for the Spyder is not even in consideration right now that the IRIS-T SLM is reaching 20km with a speed of mach 1? i find this really unfair honestly and there is no reason to not add it.
I would like to hear more about this. From your POV, what will the ‘landscape’ of top tier naval battles look like after the patch hits (assuming no further changes to the top ships).
Iowa and Soyuz will be top dog. Soyuz will be almost invincible when she can angle, but overall flexibility is more on Iowa imo. Yamato… is going to have very hard time. I don’t think it is 8.7 worthy.
French would be the best at 8.7 and only the worthy protester against 8.7. Roma is overall good, but slow reload is too ciritical
Bismarck and Vanguard…are just 8.0 worthy. They are not even much superior to existing ships.
I mainly want to confirm whether the developers will provide the AIM-9L and AIM-7P, which Switzerland never purchased. If the AIM-9P-5 and AIM-7F are provided instead, I believe they would be more reasonable choices.
GJ already confirmed that the premium will get exactly what is does have right now due to balancing considerations even if this means not matching real life.