Also i noticed smin pocking his head out so i have a question
When will devs answer the biggest controversy in community/game which is kh38mt?
I can bet my liver and 3 kidneys that he suddenly leaves this convo lmao
1 Like
Might just be IRL nobody bothered to clean it properly. I mean who would actually wipe it down fully?
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
4 Likes
Don’t give them any ideas. They gotta stop putting more advanced missiles on that kind of plane.
If a plane isn’t well suited for A2A combat the solution should be to keep its BR as low as possible by giving it low end missiles rather than the best missiles it could theoretically carry.
Cockpit textures of the Swiss F-18C Early is wrong. Showing BUNO instead of Radio Call
Cockpit textures of the F-18C Late is wrong too, Showing Radio Call J-5010 while the textures of the plane have J-5012
what needs to be fixed on the adats?
Will AIM-120C7 be any better than C5?
Bruh… They think we will forget these things. Fk that, i have it written on a paper and put on my ceiling when i wake up so i wont forget snail sins
I will keep drilling the topic and prove (cuz some believe otherwise) that snail doesnt listen to community at all
REMEMBER: “we are not greedy bastards here”
1 Like
If modelled according to IRL improvements, yes.
That is sometnihg no one knows
Waiiit…
F-18C still shares the same 14.0BR with F/A-18C (Late) and F/A-18C MLU2 without AIM-120C and HMD?
Did I miss Gaijin’s official explanation of why?
My bet is that it will be, and it’s a middle finger to any improvement to the 120C5, making it a frankenstein 120A+ with only a better motor.
If they just add motor time while carrying the same ahistorical AOA to C7s, it would only expose further the already proven incompetence and hypocrisy of the 120s introduction in-game.
Yeah I know, the Soyuz seems to be bias incarnate so far. Every other ship (y’know, those that were actually built) have some sort downside based on their real life usage (like Richelieu not having its correct muzzle velocity because “the charges blew up at Dakar”… in an extremely hot environment which played a big role in what happened) but the battleship that had to have its main belt armor split in two plates because they couldn’t produce anything bigger than 230mm and had one of its sister ship scrapped in place after only 6 months of building (Sovetskaya Belorussiya) because it had literally tens of thousands of faulty rivets gets everything “as designed”…
But even if we ignore all questionable stuff above, I’d really like to have an answer from gaijin as to WHY it’s not affected even by soft stats which are used for balance purpose.
It’s already better than Iowa and Yamato, it should absolutely get hit by the nerf bat on its RoF since its BR can’t be increased further.
6 Likes
Its Gaijin. it will probably somehow be worse.
Yup, they could have given it any RoF they wanted. 35 seconds would not be a bad RoF for it.
Then you also have the new premiums with double their IRl RoF
- elevation on gunner sight
- irst unable to properly lock munitions
- irst unable to lock beyond 11km
- radars(elevation, tws?)
- slave to the target azimuth
- missing stabilized gunner sight
- missing multi track(like pantsir)
- sth about LoS beam riding
bunch of other things
ask DevilO6 he did most of them
5 Likes
How many times do I have to tell you, no.
Not pantsir type.
But Indeed search radar TWS, so more of the new AA style.
1 Like
i have short memories like a gold fish dude mb
Yeah and the lack of BOL, PIDS, and sniper pod on American fighters??