I know what you mean. They closed it too quick hence the gif I posted.
Rereport that man its stupid
It’ll get sorted, don’t worry even if I have to escalate things.
Could you tell me which tree I need to bark up to get 65E2s on the 18c late?
You would need something that proves that the deployment / introduction of -65E-2 overlaps whatever configuration that they are modeling it after.
Well that’s the problem every time I asked for the years they won’t tell me.
Dev server still up?
prolly not
its march 6th
This thing is spring loaded and works only in flat spin
I would be curious about some of the changes. Weight is the least of the nerfs to the platform that I’d question. Main part I’ve some concerns over is the changes to TVC and how the AoA toggle feels very limited for this aircraft specfically, and the agility of the platform feels substandard compared to prior flankers, to my hand.
Though if it’s clearly documented, oh well.
2 Likes
Switching the AoA limiter off on the Typhoon feels a little wierd, I think its still massively WIP and we’ll see if they make any changes over the coming days/weeks/months with it
Tried it across the eurodeltas, and the impact feels a lot more noticeable on them and the other platforms that got it than the new flanker. Though it did feel weird on the delta wings.
Same deal with the F-15 AOA limiter release, the elevators deflect up to what looks like 65 degrees, but the actual AOA generated is surprisingly tame for so much elevator deflection.
These are the average anonymous techmod we are talking about, beyond a select few, they don’t read sources to begin with and wont pick up on information unless you manually pull every quote out and lay it in text in the main report body.
2 Likes
isnt that because EFT doesnt have an AoA switch IRL or something?
It has an emergency override or something. I’ve not been following it much and wasnt expecting it, but I think its just a WIP mechanic that we’ll see improvements in the future
2 Likes
yeah. hopefully it gets sorted out soon
They accept that the pod can track aerial targets, but not slave the radar to the sensor’s line of sight, or do so while guiding a missile.
But that’s the thing, and the is the opposite of what the report is actually claiming, or the inverse of what the changelog is actually implementing.
it’s that the sensor can keep tracking a target cued by the LOS of the radar. For example; if the target was to enter the notch.
It only touches on slaving the Radar to Sensor’s LoS to make the point that the sensor doesn’t interrupt missile guidance in any way, and that it satisfies Launch requirements (for some modes) as well.
it’s also surprising that the ATFLIR report was actioned in just under an hour while the F-14B / TCS report has sat there for just over 18, now even though it was created first.
So it’s obvious that reports aren’t being handled on a “First in, First out” basis
1 Like
They Usually handle any report they consider disprovable first it seems, As Ive seen 2 reports go up about a issue around the same time, and the one with improper sources get taken down immediately while the other was left untouched for (at the time) weeks
that explains a lot
why are the hornets wing-tip pylons missing when sidewinders aren’t loaded? all hornets fly with those even if unarmed is Gajin goofy?