Israel has a gap form reserve to 4.3 and reserve to 3.3.
Again it is just the same scenario as china, with nort korea you have a decent sub tt
Then add North Korea to it, they have a lot of potential additions.
if it needs to involve NK as a subtree then what is so much worse about adding it to US as a subtree?
because the israeli tt start at 6.0… anything below that isnt really a gap.
which is worse than US since at least they have a lot more commonality, it wouldnt screw matchmaker over, there is good history and relations between the 2 as well.
Again it is not unprecedented, china and taiwan where released together at launch.
so why cant they release SK with USA?
because the US doesnt need a sub tt…
1 Like
It is the only nation that has that. If they put it into the Us it would’ve been better, but idk what else to say I feel like your never gonna change your mind or even consider a SK sub tree
did France need 3 subtrees? did UK really need 2?
1 Like
kinda, france still have quite large gaps on the ground forces, and they only had 4 lines of aircafts, the uk also lacked and still does, neither of them have anywhere close to the same amout of vehicles that the us have and can have.
so? just because they wont have as many vehicles in the end doesnt make them bad. UK and France have very big domestic industries, but they get multiple subtrees
1 Like
well because sub tt covers gaps in the tt, and the us certainly does not suffers from that specific problem.
Also even if they have on paper multiples sub tt doesnt mean that those tt are actually implemented, even if india is a british sub tt they just have a couple of vehicles that were introduced, and there isnt even a single vehicles from luxemburg to begin with.
Also there are nations that are currently more in need of a sub tt than the US, like china or Israel.
the us should be the last nation to get one of those.
yeah, just like they can add a couple of SK vehicles to USA.
also, where is USA armed light attacker at higher BR’s? we need T-50 for that. and where is AGM-84E/H/K equipped F-15? we need F-15K for that.
China can get Pakistan, Israel can get Chile
the us have other options for those…
you can get those missiles in other us planes… literally the f18C can use those…
like what? and i said F-15 with SLAM not the hornet. 2 very different platforms
they would cover the exact same gap in performance, as the current gap is due from not having an equivalent to the kh 38, youre grasping straws, and the us have more missiles that the slam, you yourself where claiming that the f15 is compatible with the aarm which are even more powerful than the slams, not to mention the plethora of other guided bombs that the use can also get, again the us doesnt need a tt.
still no example for light attacker which many other have. also, France already has a ton of their own stuff to add, but they got a subtree.
I hope it could be like Pakistan, only premium and events, especially for non-export vehicles
1 Like